Re: I don't believe. But I have no choice...

On May 25, 10:17 am, www.freedomtofascism.com <tr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 22:34:52 -0400, "Hybrid Angel" <xXx> wrote:
> >Take a look at the Weather Channel....
>
> >Tornadoes........Kansas City, Oklahoma, Omaha....and neighboring
> >states.....North and South.....
>
> >INCREDIBLE...one after the other two/three @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 one time......
> >And others trying to form @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 the same location.....
>
> >"Man will see weather and earthquakes as he has never seen before"...
> > (HaShem) BINGO! BIG TIME BINGO...!
>
> MIND CONTROL AND RELIGION
> Coercive persuasion is secular conduct. Insofar as it is recognized as
> coercion and "undue influence," it is illegal conduct. Prohibition of
this
> specific conduct will protect the State itself and the free exercise
rights
> of all citizens without infringing on the free exercise rights of
religious
> organizations.
>
> Coercive persuasion is antithetical to the First Amendment. It achieves
much
> of the harmful result of fraud, false imprisonment, coercion, undue
> influence, involuntary, servitude, intentional infliction of emotional
> distress, outrageous conduct, and other tortuous acts.
>
> Coercive persuasion is unfair manipulation of the biological and
> psychological weaknesses and susceptibilities of one's fellow men. It is
an
> opposite to charity and kindness. It is a psychological modus operandi
of a
> criminal or totalitarian society.
>
> Coercive persuasion is not a religious practice. It is a covert control
> technology. It is not a belief or an ideology. It is a technological
process
> that impairs rationality.
>
> As a process it can be examined separately from any message content that
may
> be associated with its practitioners. This is like examining the
technical
> processes used in hypnotic induction separately from examining the
meaning
> or value of any hypnotic suggestion given during hypnosis. Examining
> processes, never beliefs, will not violate anyone's First Amendment
> religious protections.
>
> John Dewey believed that, "the human power to respond to reason and
truth
> protects democracy." Any organization using coercive persuasion on its
> members that also claims to be a religion is turning the sacred trust
and
> privileges of our democratic First Amendment sanctuary into a fortress
for
> psychological assault. It is covertly twisting "religious freedom" to
deny
> our more basic constitutional right to unfettered rationality in our
freedom
> of thought and free will.
>
> Freedom of religion cannot exist without first having an absolutely
> protected freedom of thought. Freedom of religion without freedom of
thought
> is an absurdity.
>
> http://www.factnet.org/rancho3.htm
>
>
>
> >"This ain't Kansas anymore Toto..."
>
> >Cities have been picked up and thrown down.....
> >In pieces.....WHEW.......