Re: I don't believe. But I have no choice...

On Jul 4, 3:43 am, cisco1...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> On May 25, 10:17 am,www.freedomtofascism.com<tr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 22:34:52 -0400, "Hybrid Angel" <xXx> wrote:
> > >Take a look at the Weather Channel....
>
> > >Tornadoes........Kansas City, Oklahoma, Omaha....and neighboring
> > >states.....North and South.....
>
> > >INCREDIBLE...one after the other two/three @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 one time......
> > >And others trying to form @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 the same location.....
>
> > >"Man will see weather and earthquakes as he has never seen before"...
> > > (HaShem) BINGO! BIG TIME BINGO...!
>
> > MIND CONTROL AND RELIGION
> > Coercive persuasion is secular conduct. Insofar as it is recognized as
> > coercion and "undue influence," it is illegal conduct. Prohibition of
this
> > specific conduct will protect the State itself and the free exercise
rights
> > of all citizens without infringing on the free exercise rights of
religious
> > organizations.
>
> > Coercive persuasion is antithetical to the First Amendment. It
achieves much
> > of the harmful result of fraud, false imprisonment, coercion, undue
> > influence, involuntary, servitude, intentional infliction of emotional
> > distress, outrageous conduct, and other tortuous acts.
>
> > Coercive persuasion is unfair manipulation of the biological and
> > psychological weaknesses and susceptibilities of one's fellow men. It
is an
> > opposite to charity and kindness. It is a psychological modus operandi
of a
> > criminal or totalitarian society.
>
> > Coercive persuasion is not a religious practice. It is a covert
control
> > technology. It is not a belief or an ideology. It is a technological
process
> > that impairs rationality.
>
> > As a process it can be examined separately from any message content
that may
> > be associated with its practitioners. This is like examining the
technical
> > processes used in hypnotic induction separately from examining the
meaning
> > or value of any hypnotic suggestion given during hypnosis. Examining
> > processes, never beliefs, will not violate anyone's First Amendment
> > religious protections.
>
> > John Dewey believed that, "the human power to respond to reason and
truth
> > protects democracy." Any organization using coercive persuasion on its
> > members that also claims to be a religion is turning the sacred trust
and
> > privileges of our democratic First Amendment sanctuary into a fortress
for
> > psychological assault. It is covertly twisting "religious freedom" to
deny
> > our more basic constitutional right to unfettered rationality in our
freedom
> > of thought and free will.
>
> > Freedom of religion cannot exist without first having an absolutely
> > protected freedom of thought. Freedom of religion without freedom of
thought
> > is an absurdity.
>
> >http://www.factnet.org/rancho3.htm
>
> > >"This ain't Kansas anymore Toto..."
>
> > >Cities have been picked up and thrown down.....
> > >In pieces.....WHEW.......

If it were not for religion we would not have the printing press.
Without religion none of us would be here discussing it.
It does no good to look at just one side of the equation.
We are all in this together or not at all. Change must start
from within and not from without. The best way to change
the world is by changing yourself.

Peace be with you all..

They call me Bruce