On 4 jul, 17:51, Free Lunch <lu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 08:37:29 -0700 (PDT), "pba...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
> <pba...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in alt.atheism:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 3 jul, 23:43, UseNetO...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 17:35:34 +0100, "Alex W." <ing...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >Royals dear :-) ... and the Germans
> >> >We find they are cheaper and more decorative than elected
presidents,=
and
> >> >the tourists do love them so ...
>
> >> "Some presidents" cost their people trillions of dollars ... and
> >> tourist hat them :-9. So I must admit you are right.
>
> >> >BTW, the Germans did have a revolution, in 1918-19. =A0They
abolished=
all
> >> >monarchies (and have regretted it ever since).
>
> >> You cannot call that "a revolution"; good old Wilhelm II was happy to
> >> resign. He lived happily in Holland (Doorn near Utrecht)
>
> >>http://www.dhm.de/lemo/objekte/pict/ju000737/index.html
> >> in
Germanhttp://www.dhm.de/lemo/html/weimar/revolution/abdankung/index=
..html
>
> >Revolution only means that something is turned.
> >It doesn't mean anyone has to be decapitized:)
>
> I personally like the Bohemian approach to revolution. "The
> Defenestration of Prague" is unmatched as a name for a revolt.- Tekst
uit=
oorspronkelijk bericht niet weergeven -
>
> - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -
I personally prefer "Revolver" to a Bohemian Rapsody even!
(33 revolutions a minute)
|
