On Thu, 03 Jul 2008 07:59:01 -0700, dmaster wrote:
> On Jul 1, 12:48 pm, "Mike E. Fullerton" <inforequ...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> remove-techie.com> wrote:
>> MarkA wrote:
>> > On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:50:21 -0700, HVAC wrote:
>>
>> >> "Mike E. Fullerton" <inforequ...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote
>> >> in messagenews:6U7ak.44258$Jx.43096@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>> HVAC wrote:
>> >>>> Cough, cough (bull****) cough, cough.
>> >>> Is your statement based on anything resembling fact or merely
mindless
>> >>> belief?
>>
>> >>>> <W...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message news:
>> >>>> 536-48650B38-...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>>> Rory Johnson's Magnetron Motor, as he named it, was a
revolutionary
>> >>>> new
>> >>>> source of power derived from the chemical reaction / fusion of
>> >>>> deuterium
>> >>>> and gallium.
>>
>> > ..."chemical reaction / fusion of deuterium and gallium."??? Which
is it?
>> > Chemical reactions are not nuclear events. If you can't tell which
you
>> > are seeing, you don't know what you are looking at.
>>
>> And this is a problem because...? If I obtain a reaction with excess
>> heat that can't be explained I might surmise its from a chemical or
>> nuclear reaction. Why should I care? I've got a bloody (heavy) water
>> powered car.
>
> He didn't say it produced heat. He said it produced electricity.
> Nuclear reactions produce energy in the form of radiation. Chemical
> reactions produce energy in the form of heat. We know of a couple of
> ways to produce electricity - photo-voltaic and bi-metalic junction -
> but those aren't chemical or nuclear. Still the guy does mention
> light and prisms. One of his materials, gallium, has been used in a
> lot of semi-conductors. Deuterium is of course hydrogen and deuterium
> oxide is water. Heavy water was used in the process of developing
> fission reactions, though not in the reaction itself. Fusion
> reactions use hydrogen. So the whole thing sounds like a complete
> mishmash of science words related to energy. I suppose if you don't
> really understand any of the science and you turn off your BS
> detector, you could swallow this as another wonderful free energy type
> story, but I hope you don't.
>
You can tell where Mike's head is when he admits that he doesn't care if
the reaction is chemical or nuclear. If you don't know what you're
looking at, it is much easier to be scammed. So far as I know, nobody is
driving around in a "(heavy) water powered car."
--
MarkA
(This space tem****arily unavailable)
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
|
