Subject: The Astral Body And The Higher Self.
Part 3. April 11, 2008.
This talks about how to change things.
...................................................
...................................................
I have had many other conversations with Thao
which do not appear in this book. Believe me,
these Beings are superior to us in their
e-olution, in every regard. I have learned things
which are more incredible than those revealed in
this volume, but I am not permitted to discuss
them, as we are still far from understanding them.
I will, however, take the op****tunity in this
postscript to voice my personal opinion.
I must warn the reader on some very im****tant
points.
I have already heard some remarks concerning
this book that haven't impressed me at all: `He
thinks he's the new C-rist'. `He's a great Guru.
We should follow his doctrine' or `You should
set up an Ashram, that would go down well', or
yet still, `You should found a new re-igion',
and so on.
I must say in their defence that many of these
people have only heard about my adventure. They
haven't actually read the book. I cannot emphasise
enough that it must be read several times. Why
are people so eager to hear about something as
im****tant as G-d and the creation of the Universe,
when they could be quietly reading about it,
away from the noisy congregations? Remember,
`the spoken word vanishes, but the written word
remains’.
Why do they want to form a new sect or
reli-ion with the contents of this book? The
hundreds of religi-ns we already have on this
planet haven't done much good, have they?
The M-slems fought against the Roman C-tholics
during the Crusades, in the name of Go- and
re-igion.
The Spanish Ca-holics plundered, r-ped and
pillaged the Aztecs (whose civilization was
very advanced for the time) because the Aztecs
did not practise Cat-olicism. In fact, the
Aztecs had their own relig-on, which was no
better since they sacrificed humans to their
-ods by the thousands, as did, if you recall,
the Bakaratinians during the secession in
North Africa, over one million years ago.
These r-ligions had been carefully studied
by the priests who wanted to keep the people
under their rule, so that they could maintain
power and wealth.
Any religion is like p-litics - with its
leaders' arrogance and thirst for power. C-rist
mounted a donkey, he di-d on the cross, a
re-igion was born, the donkey transformed
into a Rolls-Royce ... the V-tican is one of
the wealthiest powers on this planet.
In po-itics, the insincere po-itician, and
there are many of them, is puffed up with
pride. He wants to be admired, along with
his wealth and power and only then is he
satisfied.
And what about the thousands or millions
of people cheated by him, are they satisfied..?
Thao told me that this book is not only
intended to enlighten the inhabitants of this
planet, but also to open their eyes - wake
them wake up to what is happening around them.
Thao and her people are very concerned about the
ways in which we allow ourselves to be led by
a handful of rotten po-iticians, who skilfully
make us believe we are free and democratic,
when, in relation to the Universal Law, we are
no freer than a flock of sheep. We may
occasionally stray from the path and think we
are free, but that's an illusion, because we
end up in the meatworks without even realising
it.
The pol-ticians use the word democracy like
a smoke screen. The majority of pol-ticians
have three -ods - power, glory and money. They
are, nonetheless, afraid of the masses because
as Arki (See Chapter 10) demonstrated, groups of
people who really get on well can achieve exactly
what they want. Even the C-mmunist party in
Russia has now collapsed, and the world knows,
the K-B was a vicious and powerful organization,
but I must admit, my - or rather our friends -
avoided a huge amount of b-oodshed by giving
the `go-ahead'. I've known this for a long time,
and they may have deliberately delayed the
publication of this book so that I could include
this in the postscript.
Remember that mankind was created with freedom
of choice. All to-alitarian regimes deny this,
and they will collapse one day. I advise you to
turn your attention to China.
The leaders of many countries, who have
been elected in a so-called democratic
fa****on, just do as they like, once they're
in power. A typical example is the French
g-vernment, which is still carrying out n-clear
testing in the Pacific and polluting with
radiation the last great resource we have
left, namely the ocean. I already know from
a reliable source that the French scientists
in Mururoa are very concerned about the
`gigantism' that affects some species of fish,
particularly the parrot-fish, which has been
subjected to a-omic radiation in the area around
Mururoa. These fish have grown to three times
their natural size.
Let's hope the same doesn't happen to the
great white shark, which is found in our
waters!
Furthermore, if you carefully follow the
dates of the underwater explosions at Mururoa,
you will notice that in the hours later (but
more commonly two to four days after the
event) there is always a large-scale earthquake
somewhere on the planet, following the explosion,
of course...
French pol-tians have thus been committing
a crime on a planetary scale for several decades.
I am sorry and ashamed to have been born French….
Sadam Hussein also committed a crime against
the planet when he set light to hundreds of oil
wells. He should also be tried for the atrocities
he committed in Kuwait. What is the U-ited
Nations doing about it?
In Brazil, the go-ernments that are
systematically destroying the Amazon rainforests
and their own next generation, are also
committing a c-ime on a planetary scale.
The people who say that the system must
change are doing nothing about it. Everybody is
grumbling about the bad penal system we have.
Of course it is bad, the laws appear to have
been made in favor of crooks. So do something
about it!
Remember the penal system of the
Bakaratinians? It wasn't unlike the Aztec system,
which was excellent because of its efficiency.
It isn't enough to say `the system is bad,
they should change it'. They - whom do we mean
by They? The parliamentarians, the heads of
state, all those elected by the people, by you.
In order to change the system, the laws must
change, along with their leaders. You must
force the pol-ticians who represent you to
change the inefficient laws, the inefficient
system, once and for all. The poli-icians are
generally too idle to undertake the task on
their own. Each law requires a great deal of
work and responsibility, and that's often too
much to ask, because, as Ive said, most of
them are there for the prestige and big salary.
Incidentally, if you want to attract good
po-iticians, start by cutting their salary to
that of a suburban bank manager and you will
find that there are fewer applicants, but
those who remain will be sincere human beings
and genuinely want to do something for the
people.
You are the people who voted for these
polit-cians and most of you have had enough -
they haven't done what you expected them to do
for our country. Some day, the time will come
when the citizens must force them to do their
jobs: to fulfil the promises they made to the
majority who elected them, before the election.
When there is no other solution, ordinary
citizens can f-rce polit-cians to do their duty -
they must.
Careful - we are not talking about anarchy
here, just discipline. In a country you need the
discipline, not of a tot-litarian regime, but of a
democracy in which promises are kept. If promises
are broken, it is up to you to act because it
is abhorrent that po-iticians disappoint millions
of people when they're in power and fool people
until the next election.
These eminent poli-icians would be better off
doing their jobs rather than spending 80 per
cent of their time arguing among themselves over
internal party pol-tics.
People say to you, `What can we do? There's
nothing we can do', and that is exactly
where they are wrong!
Ordinary people can and must fo-ce the
go-ernment elected by the people and by
referendum, to carry out the tasks for
which they were elected.
Ordinary people possess enormous power. As
Arki said (See Chapter 10) one of the
greatest weapons that humans possess -
thanks to their intelligence - is the power
of inertia. It is a non-violent force and
that is best, as violence breeds more
violence. Ch-ist said, `He who lives by
the sword will die by the sword'.
In Beijing, China, a man on his own and
unarmed was able to stop a tank with his
presence alone. How did he achieve that?
Because the soldiers in the tank didn't
DARE run him over, they were enthralled by the
self-sacrificing act of the unarmed man.
Millions of people witnessed it on television.
Ghandi managed, on his own, to prevent terrible
bl-odshed. Lord Mountbatten himself realized that
if he’d sent 50 000 troops to Calcutta, they would
have been massacred and yet, Gandhi, one man,
averted a massacre through non-violent means.
Once, in Arki's planet, they blocked the roads
with so-called `broken down' vehicles: there were
10 000 of them. The police contingent knew it was
done on purpose, but they couldn't do anything
about it. When the fire brigade or an ambulance
had to pass, the people arranged to let them
through by pu****ng their vehicles out of the
way. They then pushed them back to where they
were. That is the power of inertia. They didn't
move; didn't eat; didn't scream. They were
silent - confronting the forces of law and
order. Obviously, they said, they would be
more than happy to clear the road - but how
could they, without mechanics..? The country
was paralysed. They had no banners, no slogans,
there was no shouting or yelling; just quiet
defiance.
Part 3.
John Winston. johnfw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
