Re: @ WHAT WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE ? ! @

<OBVES@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:d81f10a5-e43a-4cd1-927a-91e85d4c67a1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can Obves be called a false prophet ? Only true servants of God
> Yahweh of the class 144000 specially chosen people can determine who
> are false prophets ! And sure they will be people from outside of the
> class 144000 and their followers . Just to take it on common sense .
> Those who are of the true christian religion and teach others to
> follow them can never be called false prophets ! If they were called
> so there would be no true christian religion in existence in a given
> time.
>

Your getting warmer.

> To make this matter more unbearable to obstinate renegade christians
> you would have to show to those servants of the class 144000 that you
> have superior views on the Bible ! To attack Jehovah's Witnesses you
> would have to give them an alternative views they could turn to
> provided the views are better !
>

Giving up all that JW BS would be better.

> You heard about Harold Camping who is also predicting the year 2011
> AD in a different way. He is so brilliant in explanation of the Bible
> surpassing most christian religions that if his prediction failed he
> would not turn to catholic religion to become a catholic ! He wil stay
> in his religion because he sees his views on the Bible as the best .
> He was predicting the year 1994 AD and what happened ? He basically
> stayed his course and even went farther away from most churches  and
> now has a new prediction.
>

How could he profit from becoming a Catholic?

> Ronald Weinland will fail in his predictions for 2008 and 2009 he is
> writing about in his book : " 2008 .God's Final Witness ". So can we
> call him a false prophet because of these failures ?
> Not so much . Even if he admits he is a false prophet ! What's the
> problem ?
>
> The problem is that Ronald Weinland apart from his predictions has
> one of the best christian views on the Bible ! Better than 97% of all
> claiming to be christians and from  that 97% there will be people who
> may call Weinland a false prophet ! I would prefer to accept
> Weinland's views even if he admits he is a false prophet over the
> views of those 97% christians !
>

Only a fool would continue to follow a false prophet.

> So , you can see now that there must some other, hidden to most
> people - way of determining who is a false prophet today according to
> the Bible.
> Read my previous post and combine it with this new one to have a
> bigger picture.

Only a fool would think there is some hidden way to determine who is a
false 
prophet .

Gramps