Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Apocalypse > Re: Three Ways ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 4 Topic 3266 of 3669
Post > Topic >>

Re: Three Ways to calculate year of Second Coming

by "Lars Wilson" <siaxares@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 7, 2008 at 05:26 AM

<OBVES@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:1fb207f6-2dfe-4a11-88f8-b3a0b44a281b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 May 6, 5:21?pm, "Lars Wilson"
------
There are various ways of calculating the chronology of mankind.
One of the best is Harold Camping's chronology and you should get hold
of his publications on this topic .
He established with his methods of counting that mankind exists some
13 000 years. He has the date for the Flood in Noah's days : 4990 BC !
And 7000 years will have passed in 2011 AD . He predicts the same year
as I do for the end of the world.

YES, far, far too interesting!  But it's my date for the potential 
millennium as well.  By chronology is absolute and confirmed by
astronomical 
texts so perhaps I should share some of my research with Camping.  My 
astronomical dating is absolute and it agrees with the Biblical dating so
I 
can't seriously consider another chronology at this point.   1947, for 
instance is linked to the Exodus date.  That in turn to the rule of
Solomon, 
etc.  So it's all connected.  Once you have one absolute fixed date, then
it 
dates the entire timeline.  I've compared that with astronomical texts and

amazing came up with the same dating.

For instance, you're amazed you can Camping have the date of 2011 AD for
the 
millennium, but the VAT4956 plus the Bible both date year 37 of 
Nebuchadnezzar to 511 BCE.  That's not a coincidence.  Its just
astronomers 
trying to hide the original chronology in revised texts, that's all.  Very

simple.  But very absolute.

I come up with 2011 AD as well.  But that is based upon 1947, which is the

last jubilee in a series of 69 jubilees of 49 years each where the Exodus
is 
the first jubilee.  So basically instead of 1513 BCE for the Exodus that
JWs 
use, the correct date is 1386 BCE. That means the JW date is 127 years too

early.  I trust their calculations back to creation which most can follow 
easily from the Bible.  That means their 1975 date which is based on a
year 
after Adam was created becomes 2102 as the date for the end of 6001 years
of 
man's existence.   I'm more comfortable along with many others that Adam
was 
likely 30 years of age when Eve was created, so I add another 29 years to 
2102 to arrive at 2131 AD for the end of 6030 years after man's creation. 
Now ordinarily we'd presume that would begin the millennium, if we
presumed 
the millennium would be the absolute last 1000 years in the 7000-year day.

But we find that God does not say he is "making all things new" until
after 
Satan is released for a while and after Judmgent Day.  I thus allow 40
years 
for Satan's final testing, which is the standard period for tests, and 80 
years, one generation, for Judgment Day.   That moves the millennium up
for 
me, potentially, 120 years bringing 2131 AD forward to 2011 AD.

Now, that seems mighty strange to me YOU have that date and Camping does 
too.   So I'm thinking it doesn't matter how we arrived at the date, it's
a 
message to prepare us for this eventuality that will occur.  It's not
about 
waiting for 2011 AD though but the potential that Armageddon may begin at 
any time now, since nothing is preventing the millennium from beginning 
earlier than the cutoff, though in the past, time prophecies have been cut

fairly close, and there are Biblical indicators that Jehovah would wait to

the very last minute, or it would seem so.  The longer it delays the more 
souls can be saved.

 It is very interesting that he came up with the same date 2011 AD
with so differing calculations !

YES!  But I have the same calculation.  I'm also focussing on 2011 AD!!! 
Must be something.  I'm also following some of the dates some others are 
focussing on, even though their reason for focussing on it might not be 
relevant, still I do pay attention, since the Bible says in the last days 
holy spirit would be poured out on a lot of different people and they
would 
prophecy.  So we have to be open to that "inspiration", especially if it
is 
matching up with your own.

I am using simplified methods of calculations based on time codes in
the Bible . It is a spiritual chronology - agreed the same way like
the codes are set up in the army and hidden before outsiders !

Interesting.  You enlighten me to other chronologies I had not thought of 
before.  Like the temple is a diametrically described as a CUBE.  A number

multiplied by itself is a cube.  A square has 4 sides.  4x4 is 16. So I'm 
wondering if 16 is of Biblical significance?   Basically, probably every 
single year ends or begins another pattern.  There is not just one.  So 
Jehovah has a choice to align the "great tribulation" and the millinnium 
with various formulas.  Which one he ultimately uses is totally up to him.

But we WATCH and try to be as alert as possible.

And what happened this spirtitual chronolgy can confirm the basic
chronologicy the Watchtower came up in the publication :
" Great Babylon Has Fallen ".

It is a sign from God Yahweh how come people without any collusion
with me could had come up with dates they give !

As I said, the Bible says that in the last times Jehovah would pour some
of 
his spirit out on all kinds of people, not just the leaders of 
organizations.  He might give bits and pieces to various ones that make 
sense in the complex puzzles of others.  Everyone is not given the same 
thing.

And now someone who is not from their organization confirms their
dates independently.

I don't follow.   But basically I believe Jehovah has used JWs to focus on

im****tant dates, even if they misapply the reason.  Case in point 1874 and

1914.  Both are critical Biblical dates in my own chronology still.  So
the 
witnesses focussed on it and drew attention to it, which may have been the

only im****tant thing.  So the right dates for the wrong reason still in a 
way get the job done.

Look at the coincidence of dates as the proof .

Exactly.  I can't ignore your 2011 AD date because that's my date also!  I

have to presume God might be telling me something.  It's too much of a 
coincidence.

 What I know it was the year 1984 AD when I understood in a very
unique way 70 weeks and 7 weeks of Daniel 9.24-25.

1984!  It doesn't fit any of the basic patterns connected to my
chronology. 
Nothing significant that I can think of happened in my life in 84.  ??

And I wrote about that so many times and so profusely.

70 weeks cast into far distant future: 7 times 70 years = "7 times=
2520 years " //+ // 70 years
 7 weeks projected the same way : 7 times 7 years = " 7 times = 2520
years " // + //    7 years

1984 AD - 70 years = 1914 AD   - 2520 years =  607 BC
1984 AD - 2520 years = 537 BC -   70 years =   607 BC

Ohhhh.  I see why this dating is significant.

1984 AD - 2520 years = 537 BC       1984 AD + 7 years = 1991 AD

1991 is the end of the 11th hour.  One hour is 7 years.  11 hours of 
vineyard work beginning in 1914 is 77 years.  77 + 1914 is 1991.  So 1991
is 
significant, but not particularly 1984.   Still interesting.

1914 AD - 1984 AD - 1991 AD

This is a copy of the times when the true christianity was taught !
1984 AD - 1991 AD reminds the period : 29 AD - 33 AD - 36 AD in a
reversed way !

 36 AD = 1984 AD     1950 AD = 70 AD    1914 AD = 106 AD

36 AD - 70 weeks as 7 times 70 years = 420 years + 70 years = 455 BC

607 BC + 70 weeks as 2520 years + 70 years = 1984 AD

607 BC - 455 BC = 152 years

Interesting.  This is the interval from the fall of Jerusalem to the time 
when nehemiah rebuilt the walls in the 20th of Artaxerxes.  I wonder if 
there is some prophetic fulfillment in connection with Nehemiah's return
to 
Jerusalem in the 20th of Artaxerxes in relation to the temple and the 
return?  I tested for my dates, there was nothing coincidental.

Thanks OBVES.

Lars
 




 4 Posts in Topic:
Three Ways to calculate year of Second Coming
"Lars Wilson" &  2008-05-06 19:21:55 
Re: Three Ways to calculate year of Second Coming
"OBVES@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-06 20:42:26 
Re: Three Ways to calculate year of Second Coming
"Lars Wilson" &  2008-05-07 05:26:08 
Re: Three Ways to calculate year of Second Coming
Carl <saints@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-07 02:22:24 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 19:04:11 CST 2008.