yeuhd wrote:
> On Dec 4, 1:16 pm, English <timothy.hug...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> One amazing thing that I cannot get over is that this was regarded as
>> a murder investigation, a matter for the DPD. Why did the CIA not
>> step in and say it may be an act of war from the outset?
>
> Because they had no evidence that it was an act of war. Even if it was
> an act of war, the CIA had no authority to investigate domestic acts
> by foreign powers. That was the FBI's duty, which it did throughout
> World War II and the Cold War. The CIA did have a file on Oswald based
> on his activities in the USSR and his visit to the Soviet consulate in
> Mexico City.
>
At that time, the CIA had evidence which the FBI did not suggesting
conspiracy. The wiretaps from Mexico.
|
