by "Guest" <llcoolj@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Dec 7, 2007 at 10:40 PM
"yeuhd" <walloon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:011d4cb6-9b8c-47f7-92aa-b496f0febc80@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> No one is postulating that this old man went up to the 6th floor and
> took a few shots at the president's motorcade. He was led to the
> restroom and was seen going straight out.
>
> Thus it leaves unanswered the question at issue: if Oswald was not the
> shooter, why is it no one saw a stranger in the building that morning?
>
For me, it does not matter if Oswald took shots or not. It still does not
mean that it was not a conspiracy. You do not need two people doing the
murder in order to have a conspiracy. If Oswald never got rubbed out,
then we would know more. This is why Sirhan Sirhan was allowed to live so
that there could be no question of a conspiracy. It is odd. JFK killed.
His brother would was on his way to becoming president - killed. The son
of JFK who was a lawyer with eventual political aspirations - killed. I
wonder who or what family want to keep stopping the Kennedys from making a
comeback? There should be a law that relatives of an elected official can
never run for office. Is this Rome, Saudi Arabia or Dynastic Egypt here?
