Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Assassination JFK uncensored > A Challenge to ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 22 Topic 1415 of 1514
Post > Topic >>

A Challenge to the Nutters

by Robert Harris <reharris1@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jan 24, 2008 at 10:20 PM

I recently posted a message entitled, "The Altgens Photo", which listed a 
number of witnesses who stated that they heard two shots after events, 
which we can see, had not yet occured, in the photo taken by James Altgens

at the equivalent of Z255.

If these witnesses are correct, then the Posner scenario of audible shots 
at 160, 224, 312 is false, and the final shots were indeed, fired well 
after 255.

For some reason, every time I post about this, the LN theorists go 
completely silent. Is it possible that they have no answer to these very 
powerful visual corroborations of these Secret Service agents and law 
enforcement professionals?


But since none of them will tackle this issue, let me try another 
challenge:

Can you find even one witness who sup****ts the Posner shot timing, who can

be visually corroborated?

IOW, can you find even a single witness who said something like, "I heard 
two shots, seperated by 2-3 seconds, and then turned to look to the 
rear.".

Of course, the corroboration would be that the witness could be seen, 
turned to the rear in the Altgens, or other photo, or film.


Just to show what a good s****t I am, I'll even give you a tip. There are a

number of other visible witnesses who described turning around, relative 
to gunshots. They include Kellerman, Jackie, Greer, and Nellie Connally.


Any takers?




Robert Harris
 




 22 Posts in Topic:
A Challenge to the Nutters
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-01-24 22:20:49 
Re: A Challenge to the Nutters
Bud <sirslick@[EMAIL P  2008-01-25 21:22:13 
Re: A Challenge to the Nutters
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-01-26 14:03:23 
Re: A Challenge to the Nutters
Bob Harris <reharris1@  2008-01-27 16:09:16 
Re: A Challenge to the Nutters
Bob Harris <reharris1@  2008-01-27 22:46:06 
Re: A Challenge to the Nutters
Chuck Schuyler <chucks  2008-01-25 21:33:44 
Re: A Challenge to the Nutters
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-01-26 13:59:46 
Re: A Challenge to the Nutters
aeffects <aeffects04@[  2008-01-26 21:08:38 
Re: A Challenge to the Nutters
bigdog <jecorbett1951@  2008-01-26 23:27:37 
Re: A Challenge to the Nutters
Bob Harris <reharris1@  2008-01-27 12:52:59 
REPLY TO BIGDOG
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-01-28 20:01:02 
Re: A Challenge to the Nutters
Chuck Schuyler <chucks  2008-01-27 23:06:54 
Re: A Challenge to the Nutters
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-01-28 14:31:44 
Re: A Challenge to the Nutters
John Canal <John_membe  2008-01-28 14:32:49 
Re: A Challenge to the Nutters
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-01-29 11:34:15 
Re: A Challenge to the Nutters
John Canal <John_membe  2008-01-29 20:45:01 
Re: A Challenge to the Nutters
aeffects <aeffects04@[  2008-01-28 19:48:39 
Re: A Challenge to the Nutters
Bud <sirslick@[EMAIL P  2008-01-28 13:05:56 
Re: A Challenge to the Nutters
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-01-29 11:34:07 
Re: REPLY TO BIGDOG
bigdog <jecorbett1951@  2008-01-29 11:35:36 
Re: REPLY TO BIGDOG
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-01-31 23:44:01 
Re: A Challenge to the Nutters
bigdog <jecorbett1951@  2008-01-29 20:24:55 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Jul 23 22:31:31 CDT 2008.