In article
<a8e968a7-b1df-46de-ac60-b333a078d5ad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Chuck Schuyler <chucks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Jan 24, 9:20 pm, Robert Harris <reharr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > I recently posted a message entitled, "The Altgens Photo", which
listed a
> > number of witnesses who stated that they heard two shots after events,
> > which we can see, had not yet occured, in the photo taken by James
Altgens
> > at the equivalent of Z255.
> >
> > If these witnesses are correct, then the Posner scenario of audible
shots
> > at 160, 224, 312 is false, and the final shots were indeed, fired well
> > after 255.
> >
> > For some reason, every time I post about this, the LN theorists go
> > completely silent. Is it possible that they have no answer to these
very
> > powerful visual corroborations of these Secret Service agents and law
> > enforcement professionals?
> >
> > But since none of them will tackle this issue, let me try another
> > challenge:
> >
> > Can you find even one witness who sup****ts the Posner shot timing, who
can
> > be visually corroborated?
> >
> > IOW, can you find even a single witness who said something like, "I
heard
> > two shots, seperated by 2-3 seconds, and then turned to look to the
> > rear.".
> >
> > Of course, the corroboration would be that the witness could be seen,
> > turned to the rear in the Altgens, or other photo, or film.
> >
> > Just to show what a good s****t I am, I'll even give you a tip. There
are a
> > number of other visible witnesses who described turning around,
relative
> > to gunshots. They include Kellerman, Jackie, Greer, and Nellie
Connally.
> >
> > Any takers?
> >
> > Robert Harris
>
> What is your infatuation with witnesses, Bob?
I look at witness statements because those people were there during the
assassination and can tell us what happened, Chuck.
I then compare what they said, with their actions in the films and
photos, to confirm or deny their accuracy.
> You tend to ignore
> witnesses that conflict with your theories, and prop up witnesses that
> corroborate your theories.
Nonsense.
The entire purpose of my posting is, to ask people to post verifiable
witness testimony that DISAGREES with me.
Did you even bother to read the post you are attacking Chuck:-)
>
> You can easily solve this case based on the rifle found on the 6th
floor,
> the spent shells, the bullet/bullet fragments, and the wounds to the
> victims.
Wrong again, Chuck. You are talking about evidence against one of the
shooters.
>
> Everything else is speculation or a sideshow.
Chuck, you seem to thrive on sweeping, unsup****ted generalizations. What
exactly is wrong, with examining witness statements and then trying to
corroborate/deny their accuracy??
Isn't your REAL mission, to convince everyone to stop looking so closely
at the case?
Does it bother you, that the evidence is almost 100% AGAINST your single
assassin theory??
Does it bother you, that there is NOT EVEN ONE verifiable witness who
sup****ts your/Posner/Bugliosi/WC's shooting scenario??
Chuck, did you know that among the law enforcement professionals, there
was not a single contem****aneous statement sup****ting the shooting
scenario that is required for the SA theory??
Why doesn't that bother you Chuck?
Robert Harris
|
