Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Assassination JFK uncensored > Re: A SIMPLE RE...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 17 of 36 Topic 1417 of 1530
Post > Topic >>

Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST

by doug.wiggans@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Feb 6, 2008 at 09:41 PM

On Feb 6, 12:05 pm, Walt <papakochenb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On 6 Feb, 09:27, Robert Harris <reharr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > In article
> > <7bec6004-d274-49bc-b4fd-7b9e9e7fc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>
> >  doug.wigg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> > > On Feb 5, 10:33 pm, Robert Harris <reharr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > I don't expect anyone to agree with or even acknowledge this
video. But
> > > > I cannot fathom how anyone can see it and remain convinced that
only one
> > > > shooter was involved in the JFK assassination.
>
> > > > There is a lot that I couldn't fit into 10 minutes, but that which
I
> > > > could, does a decent job of showing you what I have been talking
about
> > > > for thirteen years.
>
> > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ql6VqZDiC6s
>
> > > > Not only that, but I never use the word "decibel" - not even once!
>
> > > > Robert Harris
>
> > > I'll start with the narrator's comments on SS Kellerman.
>
> > I am the narrator, Doug.
>
> > > The narrator
> > > describes Kellerman as "****elding his left ear" (after Z285).  If
any shot
> > > came from the GN, why ****eld the left ear & not the right (which is
the
> > > direction of the GN & where Hill thought the noise of the gunshots
> > > originated)?
>
> > That shot didn't come from the grassy knoll. Did you watch the whole
> > thing?
>
> It seems to me that nobody who has responded to this thread has
> experienced the sound of a bullet passing near his head.   I've only
> experience it once ( and that's enough) ... but I know that a bullet
> passing by produces a hell of a bang.
>
> We know that at least two bullets passed above and to the left of Roy
> Kellerman. One hit near the rear view mirror ( which would have
> produced a loud bang, and one zipped over the wind****eld and struck
> the curb near James Teague, this bullet would also have produced a
> loud bang as it passed to Kellerman's left.   Those bangs would have
> caused  Kellerman's reflexes to sheild his ear from the loud bangs.
>
Walt, you can assume as you wish to the experiences of those
responding to this thread.  Show me where the other five occupants of
the limousine ****elded their ears.  Did James Teague cover his ears?
>
>
> > > Also, did the narrator consider Kellerman may have had an
> > > earphone located in his left ear & was making an attempt to hear any
> > > instruction clearly (my speculation only)?
>
> > Kellerman wasn't wearing an earphone, Doug.
>
> > Why do you think all four people reacted within an eighteenth of a
> > second of the reaction by Zapruder, as re****ted by Dr. Alvarez?
>
> > Robert Harris- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
 




 36 Posts in Topic:
A SIMPLE REQUEST
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-05 23:33:18 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
Chuck Schuyler <chucks  2008-02-06 01:07:41 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-06 12:51:11 
NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-07 21:05:26 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-08 20:17:57 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
John Canal <John_membe  2008-02-08 20:19:24 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-09 14:16:30 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
John Canal <John_membe  2008-02-09 21:23:16 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-10 18:25:25 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
John Canal <John_membe  2008-02-10 22:56:09 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-12 17:51:47 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
John Canal <John_membe  2008-02-12 22:55:53 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-13 08:04:51 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
John Canal <John_membe  2008-02-13 14:49:24 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-13 23:50:12 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-06 10:27:58 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
doug.wiggans@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-02-06 21:41:23 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
BurlyGuard@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-02-06 21:43:17 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
doug.wiggans@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-02-06 21:44:06 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-08 08:51:07 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
David Emerling <davide  2008-02-06 21:50:14 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-09 14:19:41 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
YoHarvey <baileynme@[E  2008-02-07 01:21:31 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
"tomnln" <to  2008-02-07 08:24:25 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
"johniselin@[EMAIL P  2008-02-07 01:26:22 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-08 01:54:15 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
Walt <papakochenbrot@[  2008-02-07 23:20:42 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
"Ronald 'More-More'   2008-02-07 23:34:49 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Chuck Schuyler <chucks  2008-02-09 00:01:17 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-09 14:17:13 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Chuck Schuyler <chucks  2008-02-09 21:24:17 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-10 18:27:28 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Walt <papakochenbrot@[  2008-02-10 18:54:30 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
"Gerry Simone \(O\)&  2008-02-11 12:39:12 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Bud <sirslick@[EMAIL P  2008-02-11 21:07:58 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-20 18:20:51 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Sep 6 18:03:55 CDT 2008.