Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Assassination JFK uncensored > Re: A SIMPLE RE...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 19 of 36 Topic 1417 of 1539
Post > Topic >>

Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST

by doug.wiggans@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Feb 6, 2008 at 09:44 PM

On Feb 6, 9:27 am, Robert Harris <reharr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In article
> <7bec6004-d274-49bc-b4fd-7b9e9e7fc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>
>
>
>  doug.wigg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> > On Feb 5, 10:33 pm, Robert Harris <reharr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > I don't expect anyone to agree with or even acknowledge this video.
But
> > > I cannot fathom how anyone can see it and remain convinced that only
one
> > > shooter was involved in the JFK assassination.
>
> > > There is a lot that I couldn't fit into 10 minutes, but that which I
> > > could, does a decent job of showing you what I have been talking
about
> > > for thirteen years.
>
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ql6VqZDiC6s
>
> > > Not only that, but I never use the word "decibel" - not even once!
>
> > > Robert Harris
>
> > I'll start with the narrator's comments on SS Kellerman.
>
> I am the narrator, Doug.
>
> > The narrator
> > describes Kellerman as "****elding his left ear" (after Z285).  If any
shot
> > came from the GN, why ****eld the left ear & not the right (which is
the
> > direction of the GN & where Hill thought the noise of the gunshots
> > originated)?
>
> That shot didn't come from the grassy knoll. Did you watch the whole
> thing?
>
> > Also, did the narrator consider Kellerman may have had an
> > earphone located in his left ear & was making an attempt to hear any
> > instruction clearly (my speculation only)?
>
> Kellerman wasn't wearing an earphone, Doug.

What is your source citing which agents wore earpieces?  I am familiar 
that the limousine was equipped with a permanent radio but this wouldn't 
exclude the use of an earpiece by an agent.  Kellerman did leave the limo 
for crowd control along the route.  It would make sense that he stayed in 
contact with the use of an earpiece.  Again, I'm only speculating.  
What's your source that he did not wear one?

>
> Why do you think all four people reacted within an eighteenth of a
> second of the reaction by Zapruder, as re****ted by Dr. Alvarez?
>
> Robert Harris
 




 36 Posts in Topic:
A SIMPLE REQUEST
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-05 23:33:18 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
Chuck Schuyler <chucks  2008-02-06 01:07:41 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-06 12:51:11 
NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-07 21:05:26 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-08 20:17:57 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
John Canal <John_membe  2008-02-08 20:19:24 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-09 14:16:30 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
John Canal <John_membe  2008-02-09 21:23:16 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-10 18:25:25 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
John Canal <John_membe  2008-02-10 22:56:09 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-12 17:51:47 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
John Canal <John_membe  2008-02-12 22:55:53 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-13 08:04:51 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
John Canal <John_membe  2008-02-13 14:49:24 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-13 23:50:12 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-06 10:27:58 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
doug.wiggans@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-02-06 21:41:23 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
BurlyGuard@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-02-06 21:43:17 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
doug.wiggans@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-02-06 21:44:06 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-08 08:51:07 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
David Emerling <davide  2008-02-06 21:50:14 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-09 14:19:41 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
YoHarvey <baileynme@[E  2008-02-07 01:21:31 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
"tomnln" <to  2008-02-07 08:24:25 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
"johniselin@[EMAIL P  2008-02-07 01:26:22 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-08 01:54:15 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
Walt <papakochenbrot@[  2008-02-07 23:20:42 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
"Ronald 'More-More'   2008-02-07 23:34:49 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Chuck Schuyler <chucks  2008-02-09 00:01:17 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-09 14:17:13 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Chuck Schuyler <chucks  2008-02-09 21:24:17 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-10 18:27:28 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Walt <papakochenbrot@[  2008-02-10 18:54:30 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
"Gerry Simone \(O\)&  2008-02-11 12:39:12 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Bud <sirslick@[EMAIL P  2008-02-11 21:07:58 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-20 18:20:51 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Oct 11 23:52:15 CDT 2008.