Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Assassination JFK uncensored > Re: A SIMPLE RE...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 28 of 36 Topic 1417 of 1530
Post > Topic >>

Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST

by "Ronald 'More-More' Moshki" <sector_four@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 7, 2008 at 11:34 PM

On Feb 7, 8:24=A0am, "tomnln" <tom...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "YoHarvey" <bailey...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:73a0f683-109f-4341-bf08-1387b8434a86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Feb 6, 1:05 pm, Walt <papakochenb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 6 Feb, 09:27, Robert Harris <reharr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > In article
> > > <7bec6004-d274-49bc-b4fd-7b9e9e7fc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>
> > > doug.wigg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> > > > On Feb 5, 10:33 pm, Robert Harris <reharr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > I don't expect anyone to agree with or even acknowledge this
video=
..
> > > > > But
> > > > > I cannot fathom how anyone can see it and remain convinced that
on=
ly
> > > > > one
> > > > > shooter was involved in the JFK assassination.
>
> > > > > There is a lot that I couldn't fit into 10 minutes, but that
which=
 I
> > > > > could, does a decent job of showing you what I have been talking
> > > > > about
> > > > > for thirteen years.
>
> > > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DQl6VqZDiC6s
>
> > > > > Not only that, but I never use the word "decibel" - not even
once!=

>
> > > > > Robert Harris
>
> > > > I'll start with the narrator's comments on SS Kellerman.
>
> > > I am the narrator, Doug.
>
> > > > The narrator
> > > > describes Kellerman as "****elding his left ear" (after Z285). If
any=

> > > > shot
> > > > came from the GN, why ****eld the left ear & not the right (which
is
> > > > the
> > > > direction of the GN & where Hill thought the noise of the gunshots
> > > > originated)?
>
> > > That shot didn't come from the grassy knoll. Did you watch the whole
> > > thing?
>
> > It seems to me that nobody who has responded to this thread has
> > experienced the sound of a bullet passing near his head. I've only
> > experience it once ( and that's enough) ... but I know that a bullet
> > passing by produces a hell of a bang.
>
> > We know that at least two bullets passed above and to the left of Roy
> > Kellerman. One hit near the rear view mirror ( which would have
> > produced a loud bang, and one zipped over the wind****eld and struck
> > the curb near James Teague, this bullet would also have produced a
> > loud bang as it passed to Kellerman's left. Those bangs would have
> > caused Kellerman's reflexes to sheild his ear from the loud bangs.
>
> > > > Also, did the narrator consider Kellerman may have had an
> > > > earphone located in his left ear & was making an attempt to hear
any=

> > > > instruction clearly (my speculation only)?
>
> > > Kellerman wasn't wearing an earphone, Doug.
>
> > > Why do you think all four people reacted within an eighteenth of a
> > > second of the reaction by Zapruder, as re****ted by Dr. Alvarez?
>
> > > Robert Harris- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-=AD------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---=AD--
> Yo(Momma)Harvey wrote;
>
> I don't even bother to read Holmes postings any longer. =A0He is now in
th=
e
> Rossley group. =A0Just give em one star and move on. =A0It saves time
rofl=
mao.
>
> I write;
>
> Just like Nixon, we won't have YOU to "Kick" Around anymore.
>
> I guess that means you won't address your own evidence/testimony.
>
> NOT that you ever did.
>
> http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
>
> http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-=AD------------------------------------------------------------------------=
--- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -


It's hard to remember who is CT, who is LN. No matter.

Nov 22, 1963
Feb 08, 2008

This just in:


LHO--dead, never convicted
JRu dead-----"The world will never know..."
LBJ--gone
JBC---gone
Jackie O--ouse
RFK----ouse


You people need to have an idea, another idea,
another thought about something else.


Be neither LN nor CT
Say: "It's in the past, you see.
"Now I worry about Hill-a-ree
Or the other filth named Huck-a-bee."
 




 36 Posts in Topic:
A SIMPLE REQUEST
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-05 23:33:18 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
Chuck Schuyler <chucks  2008-02-06 01:07:41 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-06 12:51:11 
NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-07 21:05:26 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-08 20:17:57 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
John Canal <John_membe  2008-02-08 20:19:24 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-09 14:16:30 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
John Canal <John_membe  2008-02-09 21:23:16 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-10 18:25:25 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
John Canal <John_membe  2008-02-10 22:56:09 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-12 17:51:47 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
John Canal <John_membe  2008-02-12 22:55:53 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-13 08:04:51 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
John Canal <John_membe  2008-02-13 14:49:24 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-13 23:50:12 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-06 10:27:58 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
doug.wiggans@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-02-06 21:41:23 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
BurlyGuard@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-02-06 21:43:17 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
doug.wiggans@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-02-06 21:44:06 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-08 08:51:07 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
David Emerling <davide  2008-02-06 21:50:14 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-09 14:19:41 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
YoHarvey <baileynme@[E  2008-02-07 01:21:31 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
"tomnln" <to  2008-02-07 08:24:25 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
"johniselin@[EMAIL P  2008-02-07 01:26:22 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-08 01:54:15 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
Walt <papakochenbrot@[  2008-02-07 23:20:42 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
"Ronald 'More-More'   2008-02-07 23:34:49 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Chuck Schuyler <chucks  2008-02-09 00:01:17 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-09 14:17:13 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Chuck Schuyler <chucks  2008-02-09 21:24:17 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-10 18:27:28 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Walt <papakochenbrot@[  2008-02-10 18:54:30 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
"Gerry Simone \(O\)&  2008-02-11 12:39:12 
Re: NO CHUCK, IT AIN'T SUBJECTIVE!
Bud <sirslick@[EMAIL P  2008-02-11 21:07:58 
Re: A SIMPLE REQUEST
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-20 18:20:51 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Sep 6 18:40:29 CDT 2008.