On Feb 20, 12:10 am, Raymond <Bluerhy...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Jan 22, 6:16=EF=BF=BDpm, Robert Harris <reharr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > The photograph taken by AP photographer, James Altgens at the
> > equivalent of Zapruder frame, 255, provides us with an excellent,
> > objective means to timestamp many critical witness recollections
> > related to the timing of the shots.
>
> > This works because a number of witnesses who are visible in the
> > photograph, described hearing two gunshots after events that we can
> > see, had not yet happened when the picture was taken. Here are some
> > examples.
>
> > 1. SA Hickey said he was looking to his left when he heard the first
of
> > three shots. He said he then turned to his right, partially stood up,
> > and looked directly to the rear. He taid he then turned back to the
> > front, just in time to hear two shots, one of them striking the
> > President.
>
> > But at Z255, we can see that Hickey is still turned, fully facing the
> > rear. He is yet to turn to look at the President and is yet to hear
> > those two shots.
>
> > 2. SA Warren Taylor said he heard one shot, and shortly afterward,
> > stepped out of the car. He said just as his foot hit the pavement , he
> > heard two more shots.
>
> > But at Z255, we can easily see that although the door is wide open, he
> > has not yet taken that step. He has yet to do so and is yet to hear
> > those two shots.
>
> > 3. Hwy Patrolman Milton Wright, the driver of the mayor's car said he
> > heard two shots after turning off of Houston onto Elm and then
> > traveling about 30 feet.
>
> > In the Altgens photo, the mayor's car, which is next in line after the
> > car Taylor was in, is nowhere to be seen. It has yet to make that
turn,
> > and Wright is yet to hear those two shots.
>
> > 4. SA Glen Bennett said he was looking at the crowd to his right when
> > he heard heard one shot, and then turned frontward to see the
President
> > just in time to hear a gunshot, which he (mistakenly) believed struck
> > Kennedy's back. He said the fatal head shot then followed
> > "immediately".
>
> > But in blowups of the Altgens photo, we can see that Bennett is
*still*
> > turned to his right as he said he was before those final shots, and as
> > we can see him in earlier photos. He will turn to the front later, and
> > then hear those two shots which he thought struck the President's back
> > and head.
>
> > Of course, these are only a few of the witnesses whom we can timestamp
> > through the photos and films. For example, every nonvictim in the
> > Presidential limousine said he turned to examine either the President
> > or Gov. Connally, and *then* heard multiple shots or in Jackie's case,
> > "terrible noises". In each case, we can see that those turns were not
> > carried out until the Z250's or later.
>
> > Combined with the overwhelming majority of witnesses all throughout DP
> > who said the final shots were bunched closely together, these
witnesses
> > form a very solid consensus proving in a multitude of different ways,
> > that the final shots were bunched closely together.
>
> > And finally, we can pinpoint at least one of the final shots, in three
> > different ways.
>
> > 1. Nobel prize winning physicist, Dr. Luis Alvarez's determination
that
> > there was a loud noise that startled Abraham Zapruder at frame Z285
> > (Alvarez guessed that a siren may have been the cause).
>
> > 2. Statements by Charles Brehm, corroborated by four witnesses
standing
> > near him, that a shot was fired just as the President passed directly
> > in front of him and was just 15 feet away. This is *exactly*
> > where Kennedy was, relative to Brehm at Z285. =EF=BF=BD
>
> > =EF=BF=BD3. Beginning 1/3 of a second after Z285, every nonvictim in
the=
> > =EF=BF=BDlimousine either ducked, dropping his/her head by 30 or more
de=
grees,
> > =EF=BF=BDand/or spun rapidly around, all beginning in the same 1/6th
of =
a
> > =EF=BF=BDsingle second. The reactions were not only in perfect unison,
b=
ut were
> > =EF=BF=BDextremely rapid.
>
> > 1.5 seconds later, a nearly perfect shot struck President Kennedy in
> > the back of the heard.
>
> > Tests by experts for both the HSCA and FBI determined that a minimum
of
> > 2.25 seconds was required to reload and aim the weapon.
>
> > Additional tests, employing expert riflemen from the Wash. DC police
> > force, firing through only the iron sights of the rifle, at larger
> > targets, 100 feet closer than Kennedy was at Z312, further confirmed
> > this point. =EF=BF=BD
>
> > There was at least one other sniper at work that day. There was, with
> > no doubt whatsoever, a conspiracy to murder this President.
>
> > Bob Harris
>
> > --
> > Check out my website, The JFK Assassination Home
Pagehttp://www.thuntek.=
net/jfk/
>
> > the FTP site is:ftp://ftp.thuntek.net/pub/users/sub/reharris/
>
> RE:There was at least one other sniper at work that day. There was,
> with
> no doubt whatsoever, a conspiracy to murder this President.
>
> Bob Harris
>
> Agreed ; There was, with no doubt whatsoever, a conspiracy to murder
> this President. But, there was no other sniper at work that day.
> There was no need for another shooter. One shooter did what was called
> for and was successful. An easy shot.
ahh, it was? Another LN well-wisher, sigh..... but it is nice to see a
new alias from time to time.....
What was surprising is that it
> took two shots to do the job. The physical evidence eliminates another
> shooter.
>
> By the way.... Is Jim Braden dead? David "Didi" S=EF=BF=BDnchez Morales
i=
s.
>
>
http://cuban-exile.com/doc_226-250/doc0244.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wik=
i/David_S%C3%A1nchez_Morales
> "Well, we took care of that SOB, didn't we?"
|
