Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Assassination JFK uncensored > Re: The Witness...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 13 of 31 Topic 1413 of 1544
Post > Topic >>

Re: The Witnesses

by geovulture@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Feb 23, 2008 at 12:11 PM

On Feb 22, 11:40=A0am, Robert Harris <reharr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In article
> <590c608f-19f2-4a53-8e7b-c247e5d32...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>
>
>
>
>
> =A0geovult...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> > On Jan 25, 11:19=A0am, yeuhd <wall...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > On Jan 24, 10:13=A0pm, Robert Harris <reharr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > Do you have a copy of the Towner film, btw?
>
> > > > Look closely at JFK as the limo turns onto Elm. There is a
maddening=
 break
> > > > in the film, in which several frames are missing, but I think we
see=
 him
> > > > react to something, just before the limo comes between Towner and
th=
e
> > > > TSBD. During those missing frames, he seems to have fallen to his
le=
ft,
> > > > and then we see him returning to an upright position.
>
> > > Eight frames are missing from the splice in the Towner film
sequence,
> > > running 0.34 second.
>
> > It's ridiculous to say that there is no doubt about the timing.
> > Reading through those accounts, there are maybe one or two that say
> > the shots were right on top of each other (bang, bang). =A0The
remainder=

> > are all using subjective terms that we have no actual reference for in
> > terms of seconds. =A0
>
> But this is only part of the story. Dr. Luis Alvarez confirmed that
> there was a very loud noise at frame 285, 1.5 seconds before the fatal
> head wound. This video will confirm the real nature of that noise.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DQl6VqZDiC6s
>
> Robert Harris- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Confirm is a strong word for what you have presented in that video. 
Guessed is a better term.  None of the reactions that you call out occur 
as reflexes.  They all appear to be natural, congnitive, delayed reactions

to the first bullet striking the two men.  Anyone who compares those 
reactions to the simultaneous startle reflexes that you see in the frames 
following 313 will agree that this is not the same type of reaction.
 




 31 Posts in Topic:
The Witnesses
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-01-22 18:19:21 
Re: The Witnesses
claviger <historiae.fi  2008-01-24 00:21:56 
Re: The Witnesses
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-01-24 22:13:31 
Re: The Witnesses
"tomnln" <to  2008-01-25 00:51:14 
Re: The Witnesses
YoHarvey <baileynme@[E  2008-01-25 21:43:09 
Re: The Witnesses
"tomnln" <to  2008-01-26 00:26:56 
Re: The Witnesses
"tomnln" <to  2008-02-03 11:37:31 
Re: The Witnesses
geovulture@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-02-21 14:58:24 
Re: The Witnesses
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-22 12:40:46 
Re: The Witnesses
claviger <historiae.fi  2008-02-22 12:59:45 
Re: The Witnesses
YoHarvey <baileynme@[E  2008-02-22 13:00:39 
Re: The Witnesses
geovulture@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-02-23 12:10:00 
Re: The Witnesses
geovulture@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-02-23 12:11:25 
Re: The Witnesses
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-23 22:53:02 
Re: The Witnesses
Walt <papakochenbrot@[  2008-02-23 09:35:30 
Re: The Witnesses
Walt <papakochenbrot@[  2008-02-23 17:04:28 
Re: The Witnesses
claviger <historiae.fi  2008-02-24 13:44:21 
Re: The Witnesses
Walt <papakochenbrot@[  2008-02-24 13:50:03 
Re: The Witnesses
Walt <papakochenbrot@[  2008-02-24 20:40:21 
Re: The Witnesses
geovulture@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-02-24 21:17:43 
Re: The Witnesses
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-02-26 18:29:14 
Re: The Witnesses
claviger <historiae.fi  2008-02-26 18:43:37 
Re: The Witnesses
"tomnln" <to  2008-02-27 00:54:32 
Re: The Witnesses
geovulture@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-02-27 14:05:04 
Re: The Witnesses
Robert Harris <reharri  2008-03-01 10:22:55 
Re: The Witnesses
Raymond <Bluerhymer@[E  2008-02-27 12:43:09 
Re: The Witnesses
Bud <sirslick@[EMAIL P  2008-03-01 19:28:41 
Re: The Witnesses
Raymond <Bluerhymer@[E  2008-03-08 15:52:46 
Re: The Witnesses
Bud <sirslick@[EMAIL P  2008-03-08 22:43:06 
Re: The Witnesses
Raymond <Bluerhymer@[E  2008-03-08 22:45:03 
Re: The Witnesses
Raymond <Bluerhymer@[E  2008-03-08 22:50:12 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Nov 19 9:45:35 CST 2008.