Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Assassination JFK uncensored > Re: Vietnam, th...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 1440 of 1505
Post > Topic >>

Re: Vietnam, the Military-Industrial Complex, and Assassination

by Raymond <Bluerhymer@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 1, 2008 at 09:39 PM

On Mar 1, 12:34=EF=BF=BDpm, John McAdams <john.mcad...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:=

> On 29 Feb 2008 13:10:51 -0500, alo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>
> >uh, John - did you read that ENTIRE Bobby Kennedy interview; it's
> >really =EF=BF=BDquite inconclusive, and it includes the following:
>
> Nice you all that was on my web site (which is not the "entire"
> interview, but is pretty much all that was relevant to Vietnam).
>
> If you are arguing that Kennedy might not have sent hundreds of
> thousands of troops into Vietnam, you may be right -- although nobody
> can really know.
>
> But the question is whether he had *already* decided to pull out and
> let the Communists take over.
>
> The answer to that is: =EF=BF=BD"No."
>
>
>
>
>
> >Martin:
> >There was never any consideration given to pulling out?
> >Kennedy:
> >No.
> >Martin:
> >But the same time, no disposition to go in all . . .
> >Kennedy:
> >No . . .
> >Martin:
> >. . . in an all out way as we went into Korea. We were trying to avoid
> >a Korea, is that correct?
> >Kennedy:
> >Yes, because I, everybody including General MacArthur felt that land
> >conflict between our troops, white troops and Asian, would only lead
> >to, end in disaster. So it was. . . . We went in as advisers, but to
> >try to get the Vietnamese to fight themselves, because we couldn't win
> >the war for them. They had to win the war for themselves.
>
> >-Allen Lowe
>
> .John
> --------------http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm-
Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

 Kennedy's war

"The year is 1968. 500 000 American soldiers are situated in Vietnam. More

bombs are falling over the country than over Germany in World War II. 
Thousands of American soldiers die, hundreds of thousand Vietnamese. The 
war is drowning in an ocean of suffering and death. The civilians are 
dragged more and more into the actions of war. Thousands of women and 
children die. Who is responsible?"

After World War II, the area known as French Indochina became the focus of

independence movements. French Indochina included the countries that today

are called Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam. Fighting in Indochina lasted for 
nearly 30 years and had world-wide consequences.

In 1951 Kennedy visited French Indochina. The United State's policy was to

give full support to the French in their struggle against the communist 
rebellions in Vietnam. When Kennedy came back to Washington D.C., he 
proclaimed that weapons alone could not stop the communists from a full 
take over in Southeast Asia, but it was very necessary to give the people 
anti-communistic thoughts. Without the support from the native Vietnamese,

there was no hope for success in Southeast Asia. In 1954 France 
surrendered Indochina, and Vietnam was divided into two parts, North 
Vietnam and South Vietnam. Laos and Cambodia were given full independence.

In December 1961, President Kennedy signed a declaration, in which he 
promised to help South Vietnam maintain its independence. The United 
States' effort in the war substantially increased. The same month the 
first American troops arrived in Saigon. 400 uniformed army personnel were

sent to operate two helicopter units. The Kennedy Administration, however,

said that the troops were not meant for combat. In December 1962, the 
United States had 11 200 troops in South Vietnam.

In the meanwhile, the Diem government was unable to defeat the communists.

They were also unable to cope with the growing unrest of the South 
Vietnamese Buddhists, with many of them burning themselves to death in 
protest of the war. Lots were arrested and charged of undermining the 
government. The government claimed that the Buddhist groups had been 
infiltrated by communists and politically hostile persons.

On 1 November 1963 the Diem government was overthrown in a military coup 
and Diem was executed. A new government, headed by General Duong Van Minh,

was established.

President Kennedy wanted to keep South Vietnam from having a communistic 
government and before his inauguration, he and President Eisenhower had 
several discussions about the Vietnam issue. Quite often Vietnam became 
centre of their discussion, and Kennedy felt great concern about Vietnam.

11 October 1963, McGeorge Bundy signed the National Security Action 
Memorandum No. 263. He wrote that President Kennedy had said no formal 
announcement should be made on the plans to withdraw 1 000 military 
personnel by the end of 1963. But when Secretary of Defense, Robert 
McNamara, returned from Saigon, he and Kennedy agreed that an announcement

should be made on the subject.

President Kennedy was determined to let the public believe he had all 
intentions to carry on with the war in Vietnam. In 1963, Kennedy's special

counsellor, Arthur M. Schlesinger said "Kennedy was still playing out his 
public hand while secretly wondering how to get out." This gives us a 
clear view that he in fact intended to withdraw regardless of victory, by 
mid-1965. President Kennedy supported a full military withdrawal from 
Vietnam, but he said "if he announced a withdrawal of American military 
personnel from Vietnam before the 1964 election, there would be a wild 
conservative outcry against returning him to the Presidency for a second 
term." Further he said in a private comment to the White House aide, 
Kenneth O'Donnell, "In 1965, I'll become one of the most unpopular 
Presidents in history. I'll be damned everywhere as a Communist appeaser. 
But I don't care. If I tried to pull out completely now from Vietnam, we 
would have another Joe McCarthy scare on our hands, but I can do it after 
I'm reelected. So we had better make damned sure that I am reelected." It 
was very important for President Kennedy not to let the public know his 
withdrawal plans. In a very confusing press conference on 14 November 
1963, he said the Honolulu conference that was to come, would concentrate 
on "how we can intensify the struggle, how we can bring Americans out of 
there. Now that is our object, to bring Americans out of there."

In 1963, the American author and historian, John Newman, said "Secretary 
of Defense, Robert McNamara, was determined to execute the President's 
intent: A genuine withdrawal from Vietnam." He also mentions that McNamara

gave instructions to General Harkins to come up with a plan to "wrap 
things up and come home."

In 1967, the Director of State Department Intelligence, Roger Hilsman, 
claimed President Kennedy intended to withdraw from Vietnam. He also said 
Kennedy before his death had begun to implement a plan to withdraw from 
Vietnam.

In a review of a biography about Robert McNamara in 1993, Robert Kuttner, 
a reporter in the Boston Globe, wrote "with Kennedy, Robert McNamara 
embraced a plan to increase assistance but turn the show over to the 
Vietnamese, win or lose, by 1965." Deborah Shapley, an American author, 
wrote in her book "Promise" that McNamara had told her he and Kennedy had 
agreed to withdraw from Vietnam without victory.

Considering that three of the most prominent associates of the President 
refute the existence of a withdrawal plan, questions if there ever was 
one. Among these are the President's own brother, Robert Francis Kennedy, 
the Attorney General. The other two is Kennedy's special counsellor and 
friend, Arthur M. Schlesinger, and Kennedy's first appointed official, 
Theodore Sorenson.

Schlesinger has different opinions of Kennedy's withdrawal plans. In his 
book, "A thousand days", he gives no indication of Kennedy even 
considering withdrawal. "A thousand days" gives a day by day review of the

Kennedy Adminstration and the only indication of withdrawal the book gives

is McNamara's statement on the withdrawal of troops by the end of 1963. 
Schlesinger claims Kennedy had a fear of upsetting the world balance if 
the United States were to withdraw. Further he writes that Kennedy in 1963

said there was a need to establish a stabile and "friendly" government in 
South Vietnam in order for the country to maintain its independence. For 
the United States to go back on their promise on this issue would mean a 
full collapse of South Vietnam, and even Southeast Asia. "So we are going 
to stay there," Kennedy stated in a press conference in spring of 1963.

Sorenson seems to be quite certain on the issue of withdrawal. There was 
no withdrawal plan. Sorenson claimed that Kennedy felt the free world 
security was severely threatened if South Vietnam was lost and Southeast 
Asia was to fall in the hands of the communistic China. According to 
Sorenson Kennedy's commitment to help South Vietnam was carried out to its

fullest. Kennedy steadily increased the military strength from 2000 troops

in 1961 to 15 500 at the end of 1963. Kennedy had said a withdrawal from 
Vietnam would just make it easier for the communists, leading Sorenson to 
believe there was no plan.

In 1962, President Kennedy's brother, Robert, made a statement on the 
Vietnam issue saying "the solution lies in our winning it. This is what 
the President intends to do. We will remain here until we do." The 
Attorney General's own understanding of his brother's policies, was to win

the war. Therefore he fully supported President Johnson's escalation in 
1965. Later on, Robert F. Kennedy changed his policies, turning to one of 
the most prominent critics towards Johnson's war policies.

2000-2001 Christoffer Hansen All rights reserved

                              Defend The Flag

                 The wall is full with names of sons
                 That lost their lives to foreign guns.
                 Who's to blame? "We're not the ones."
                 And with these words each leader runs.

                 Who are these men we pick to lead
                 That waste our youth and make them bleed?
                 These must be men of awful need
                 That can commit this dreadful deed.

                 These wretched men who live to lie
                 Are not the ones that fight and die.
                 They cause this woe and merely sigh
                 While mother's hearts are made to cry.

                 "Defend the flag-this is the way."
                 We never question what they say.
                 But pain and death will end the day
                 And in the earth our children lay.

                 We ask our youth their lives to lend
                 While our leaders strut and spend.
                 It's off to Hell these leaders send
                 Then this madness just might end.

                                             Raymond




 1 Posts in Topic:
Re: Vietnam, the Military-Industrial Complex, and Assassination
Raymond <Bluerhymer@[E  2008-03-01 21:39:43 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 4 22:57:23 CDT 2008.