Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Assassination JFK uncensored > Re: Vietnam, th...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 1441 of 1514
Post > Topic >>

Re: Vietnam, the Military-Industrial Complex, and Assassination

by Raymond <Bluerhymer@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 1, 2008 at 09:48 PM

On Mar 1, 12:34=EF=BF=BDpm, John McAdams <john.mcad...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:=

> On 29 Feb 2008 13:10:51 -0500, alo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>
> >uh, John - did you read that ENTIRE Bobby Kennedy interview; it's
> >really =EF=BF=BDquite inconclusive, and it includes the following:
>
> Nice you all that was on my web site (which is not the "entire"
> interview, but is pretty much all that was relevant to Vietnam).
>
> If you are arguing that Kennedy might not have sent hundreds of
> thousands of troops into Vietnam, you may be right -- although nobody
> can really know.
>
> But the question is whether he had *already* decided to pull out and
> let the Communists take over.
>
> The answer to that is: =EF=BF=BD"No."
>
>
>
>
>
> >Martin:
> >There was never any consideration given to pulling out?
> >Kennedy:
> >No.
> >Martin:
> >But the same time, no disposition to go in all . . .
> >Kennedy:
> >No . . .
> >Martin:
> >. . . in an all out way as we went into Korea. We were trying to avoid
> >a Korea, is that correct?
> >Kennedy:
> >Yes, because I, everybody including General MacArthur felt that land
> >conflict between our troops, white troops and Asian, would only lead
> >to, end in disaster. So it was. . . . We went in as advisers, but to
> >try to get the Vietnamese to fight themselves, because we couldn't win
> >the war for them. They had to win the war for themselves.
>
> >-Allen Lowe
>
> .John
> --------------http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm-
Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

America is a Plutocracy

The term "plutocracy" is formally defined as government by the wealthy, 
and is also sometimes used to refer to a wealthy class that controls a 
government, often from behind the scenes.

Example:
The Carlyle Group
http://www.hereinreality.com/carlyle.html

More generally, a plutocracy is any form of government in which the 
wealthy exercise the preponderance of political power, whether directly or

indirectly.

http://www.progressiveliving.org/plutocracy_defined.htm

Let us prey.
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Re: Vietnam, the Military-Industrial Complex, and Assassination
Raymond <Bluerhymer@[E  2008-03-01 21:48:26 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Jul 24 22:19:17 CDT 2008.