Raymond wrote:
> On Mar 5, 12:39=EF=BF=BDam, thaliac...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>> On Mar 4, 11:39=EF=BF=BDam, Raymond <Bluerhy...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>> Familiar Faces In Dealey Plaza
>>> by Allan Eaglesham=EF=BF=BD & Martha Schallhorn=EF=BF=BD
>>> This article was originally published in JFK Deep Politics Quarterly
>>> Volume VI Number 1, October 2000, pages 28-35.
>>> It's worth a look see.
>>> (Please click on the thumbnail image to display the full page)
>>> http://www.jfkresearch.com/faces.htm
>> Wow! Thanks for that, a very impressive article. It is my belief that =
the
>> assassination was a military style ambush. If these men are not who th=
e
>> article says they are, then WHO are they?? Were they ever identifies a=
nd
>> called as witnesses? That Lansdale photo is particularly interesting, =
I
>> would bet a lot of money it was Lansdale. He actually looks like he is
>> trying not to get photographed while letting his presence be known to =
the
>> "tramps" almost like he is their "handler." By the way, the HSCA was a
>> currupted commitee, completely controlled and manipulated by the CIA s=
o I
>> don't believe much of anything they had to say.The men identified at l=
east
>> look like the men the article pur****ts them to be, unlike the tramp ph=
otos
>> which are downright laughable.
>=20
> Whether it is Lansdale or not, he certainly is a suspect in assassinati=
ng=20
> JFK.
>=20
No, he isn't.
> Gen. Edward G. Lansdale was a celebrated CIA man who masterminded vario=
us=20
> assassination plots for the CIA and was heavily involved in Vietnam. He=
=20
> was CIA, but worked under the cover of an air force colonel. At the tim=
e=20
> of the assassination, Lansdale was supposed to be visiting his son in S=
an=20
> Antonio, but a claim check found in his personal papers places him at a=
=20
> hotel used by the presidential entourage the night before the=20
> assassination.
>=20
I doubt it, but how about providing some proof?
> http://www.prouty.org/giamarco.html
>=20
Prouty is not a reliable source.
> JFK assassination Edward Lansdale
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DV1Wmj9GPsQo
> http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/CIAlansdale.htm
>=20
> SUSPECTS IN THE JFK ASSASSINATION
> http://ourworld.cs.com/mikegriffith1/id140.htm
>=20
> Lansdale's protege in the CIA was Allen Dulles who was fired by
Protege? Do you even know what the word protege means? Jeez. Dulles
goes=20
back to WWII.
> President Kennedy because of the fiasco of the Bay of Pigs and then
> appointed to the Warren Commission to Investigate JFK Assassination.
>=20
Dulles is a possible conspiratorial connection.
> Of course, we will have to wait for the final authority on the JFK murd=
er=20
> to inform us that we are probably wrong in even having such a thought=20
> about Lansdale being involved. That would be Tony Marsh who has already=
=20
> said, "Not worth it. Most of that nonsense was debunked by the HSCA".
>=20
I don't think the HSCA knew about any allegations related to Lansdale.
> Dealing with know-it-alls--even if you are one yourself
>=20
At least know-it-alls know that Dallas time is one hour behind New York=20
time. That's why we need a know-it-all to debunk nonsense from people=20
who do not know basic facts. Did you know that you had to change your=20
clock last weekend?
> Know-it-alls are among the most annoying types encountered in the
> laboratory. These exasperating experts may be knowledgeable in their
> respective fields, but when they condescend to share their wisdom,
> they belittle others. They intimidate us with their air of superiority
> and frequent put-downs.
>=20
Some people need to be belittled, because they don't know what the Hell=20
they are talking about and state things as facts which are physically=20
impossible.
> How does someone become a know-it-all? Who are the most likely
> candidates? The truth is that any of us can fall into the trap.
>=20
> --- By Nations, Kenneth H., III
> Publication: Medical Laboratory Observer
>=20
>=20
>=20
|
