Pat,
All seem to be good ideas and I will be assembling all of these, with the
proper credit, to the producer. I, too, would like to see F8 as a topic.
However, as I've noted many times, the color versions (#44 & #45) clearly
show his right cheek area complete with his orangish tan skin, the right
upper trapezius...and the very skull fragment seen in the Zfilm...all
clearly pointing to a frontal picture. Those pictures show a bit more than
F8 does, as the camera seemed to be a bit further away from his head.
The true value of those pictures is in that they show the entrance wound.
Proper recreation of the photograph would also isolate the location, once
and for all, of entrance to the posterior skull.
Regarding the Zfilm spatter, I have an identical Carcano with WCC
ammunition, as well as two Zapruder model cameras. I'd also like to see
something to that regard.
Chad
"pjspeare@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <pjspeare@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:4d02b6a8-682f-4b78-bc20-51755d4b0411@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Chad, past differences aside, I respect that you came to this forum
> asking for suggestions from CT and LN alike.
>
> A couple of suggestions for the Discovery Channel.
>
> 1. Re-create the paper bag. Measure the time and space needed for its
> creation. Demonstrate the appearance and sound of having this bag
> stuffed down the back of a slight man's pants, and its transfer to the
> Paine's house in Frazier's car. Demonstrate the dismantling of a rifle
> similar to Oswald's. Carry it around in the bag. Compare its
> appearance to Frazier's testimony. See if it leaves any marks inside
> the bag.
> 2. Re-create the head shot on the Z-film, using a weapon like Oswald's
> and a camera like Zapruder's, shooting from Zapruder's angle, to see
> if backspatter should be apparent on the film.
> 3. Re-enact a tangential shot to the right side of a cranium from
> behind, to see if it will re-create the rapidly forward then back-and-
> to-the-left movement seen on the Z-film.
> 4. Attempt a recreation of F8, using actual skulls on an actual
> autopsy table, to see if the photo was taken from in front or from
> behind, dealing with the issues raised at chapter 14 at patspeer,com.
> 5. Explore the NAA work performed on Oswald's cheek cast, and its
> ramifications, as discussed at chapter 4c at patspeer.com.
>
>
> On Mar 23, 8:31 pm, "Chad Zimmerman" <doc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Robert,
>>
>> I am simply relaying an inquiry that was made to me. I am not
interested
>> in debating your theories, although it'd be interesting to hear your
>> theory regarding my having any control whatsoever in the editing
process
>> of the company contracted by the Discovery Channel.
>>
>> I can say, however, that I didn't put the coat on any subject, nor did
it
>> rise six inches. Regarding your challenge, Bob, there is a reason why
>> 'second opinions' are oft sought after. The strange thing is that
people
>> think it is weird when someone else, using different processes, comes
up
>> with something different.
>>
>> Chad
>>
>> "robert harris" <reharr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>> news:reharris1-9092A3.09511922032008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> > In article <47e3d...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> > "Chad Zimmerman" <doc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> > How goes it Chad?
>>
>> > BTW, why did you have to put your test subject's jacket back on him
>> > when
>> > he raised his arm, supposedly causing that metal thingie to rise 6
>> > inches? Why didn't you let us actually watch the process?
>>
>> > Obviously, JFK's silk lined jacket didn't pull the ****rt upward, so
>> > wouldn't it have made your presentation more impressive if we could
see
>> > it happen ourselves?
>>
>> > I posted a video about that at Youtube. Maybe you would like to
address
>> > some of the questions I raised.
>>
>> >http://youtube.com/watch?v=7vzIxkq9EEc
>>
>> > BTW Chad. Would you be interested in a small wager that a different
>> > doctor, conducting that same test on the same subject, could NOT
>> > reproduce your results??
>>
>> > It doesn't have to be about money. I would settle for a public
>> > admission.
>>
>> > Robert Harris
>>
>> >> Hello All,
>>
>> >> I hope this year has found everyone prosperous. As most may know, I
am
>> >> no
>> >> longer active on aajfk. I wanted to pass along that I've been in
>> >> contact
>> >> with a television producer that is looking to produce another JFK
>> >> assassination related episode for the Discovery Channel. He is
>> >> currently
>> >> seeking ideas that could be pursued and is looking for input. As
most
>> >> of
>> >> their shows are CSI styled shows, I would assume that is the style
of
>> >> program they're looking for. However, all ideas are more than
welcome.
>> >> I
>> >> have suggested unraveling F8, perhaps a segment on the NAA,
>> >> investigating
>> >> alleged engine noise on the acoustics, etc.
>>
>> >> If you have an idea, please pass it along on this thread and I will
be
>> >> sure that the producer is made aware of the ideas.
>>
>> >> Regards,
>>
>> >> Chad
>
>
|
