

|
 |
| << Topic |
< Post |
Post 52 of 60 Topic 10328 of 11072
|
Post > |
Topic >> |
Re: JFK, Addison's Disease, Iatrogenic Cu****ng's Syndrome, and the
by "tomnln" <tomnln@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
May 2, 2008 at 12:52 AM
| "Anthony Marsh" <anthony_marsh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:FPydnRtAksSlq4fVnZ2dnUVZ_uednZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> tomnln wrote:
>> Jas;
>>
>> The Parkland Dr.s handled an average of 1271 gunshot victime per year.
>>
>> Humnes/Boswell never performed an autopsy in their lives.
>>
>> Which ones do you think was better qualified to evaluate the Presidents
>> wounds?
>>
>
> The ER doctors did not evaluate the President's wounds. They were too
busy
> trying to save his life. ER doctors routinely make mistakes about
gunshot
> wounds.
Please PROVE that the Parkland Dr's were "mistaken"?
Then list the attributes of the Bethesda Dr's?
>> "Jas" <jstell1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:4816adba$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> thaliacole wrote: "How do you explain the Dr's at Parkland who
>>> stated/testified that Kennedy had a small entrance wound in his throat
>>> when he was brought in after the shooting."
>>>
>>> The Parkland doctors were trauma doctors pressed for time and occupied
>>> with saving Kennedy's life. Noting wounds on Kennedy's body, and going
>>> into detailed examination was impossible and only cursory at best.
They
>>> neither had the time nor the authority to go any further with any
>>> examination. The autopsy pathologists were the ones to do that at the
>>> autopsy at Bethesda.
>>>
>>> thaliacole also wrote: "The simplest explanation for the strange
>>> anomolies in Kennedy's wounds is that he was, in fact, shot from both
>>> the front and back. Easy! You do get an award for coming up with the
>>> silliest explanation for the discrepencies I have heard so far!"
>>>
>>> Why, thank you for that. How nice of you. I'll tell you this much, and
>>> this is all I'll tell you so as not to waste any more of my time -- my
>>> ideas make a whole lot more sense than your "he was shot in the throat
>>> by a flechette" statement.
>>>
>>> Your statement doesn't even deserve a response, except, "good grief
man,
>>> get a grip."
>>>
>>> And, by the way, what in the world does your point have to do with the
>>> curvature of Kennedy's upper back due to cortisone use sup****ting the
>>> SBT? If you want to spout off about your "flechette," start your own
>>> thread.
>>>
>>> James
>>>
>>> <thaliacole@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>
news:80931670-951b-4d51-b4b9-ca66882274a5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Apr 27, 9:25 am, "Jas" <jste...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> As we know, there's a lot of controversy stirred up by conspiracists
>>>> over
>>>> Kennedy's back wound location and whether a single bullet fired by
>>>> Oswald
>>>> from the sixth floor TSBD could pass through and out his lower
anterior
>>>> neck, (if, according to them, it p***** out at all), and goes on
>>>> through
>>>> Connally, through his right wrist, into his left leg, and ending up
on
>>>> a
>>>> stretcher at Parkland Hospital -- the Single Bullet Theory, CE 399.
>>>> Conspiracists maintain that the upper body bullet trajectory isn't on
a
>>>> downward path because the exit wound in the lower throat is higher
than
>>>> the upper back, therefore another bullet hit Kennedy in the throat
from
>>>> the front, and they say the autopsists found the bullet hole in
>>>> Kennedy's
>>>> upper back positioned lower on his back than the Warren Commission
did.
>>>>
>>>> Conspiracists also say that the bullet hit Kennedy lower than the
>>>> Warren
>>>> Commission and its defenders say it did, because the bullet holes in
>>>> his
>>>> ****rt and jacket are lower than the Commission said, therefore it was
a
>>>> shot from somewhere other than the TSBD, possibly the Dal-Tex
building.
>>>> They say this can be proven by where his ****rt and jacket were
located
>>>> on
>>>> his back -- "bunched up," or "not bunched up" -- at the time of the
CE
>>>> 399
>>>> shot at around Z-223.
>>>>
>>>> For conspiracists to use these perceived viewpoints as "evidence" or
>>>> proof
>>>> of other shooters in Dealey Plaza in trying to prove the SBT invalid,
>>>> is
>>>> wrong. Other than the fact that there were indeed mistakes, changes,
>>>> and
>>>> some confusion in the autopsists re****ts and testimonies regarding
the
>>>> actual location of the upper back bullet hole, I feel the reason for
>>>> the
>>>> confusion was not because of a cover-up and conspiracy, but because
of
>>>> a
>>>> condition I believe Kennedy suffered from known as Iatrogenic
Cu****ng's
>>>> Syndrome.
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately I can't verify this by citing re****ts and do***ents
>>>> because
>>>> I don't have access to Kennedy's confidential medical records, nor do
I
>>>> have charts and diagrams with the actual mathematical measurements of
>>>> the
>>>> curves of his spine while he is sitting in the back seat of his limo,
>>>> the
>>>> likes of which I highly doubt were done by his doctors in the first
>>>> place.
>>>> But from Kennedy's known medical condition and certain known medical
>>>> facts, I can draw a solid inference that he suffered from this
>>>> disorder,
>>>> and that this can help to understand how the SBT can, and does, work.
>>>>
>>>> What I do have is the known fact that Kennedy suffered from Addison's
>>>> Disease, had for many years and indeed almost died from it, and the
>>>> fact
>>>> that he was prescribed large doses of cortisone to treat it. I also
>>>> have
>>>> the known medical fact that intake of large doses of cortisone, over
>>>> time,
>>>> causes osteo****osis and a condition known as Iatrogenic Cu****ng's
>>>> Syndrome, an exaggerated outward curving of the upper spine and
forward
>>>> positioning of the chest, head and neck area (also called Kyphosis).
>>>>
>>>> For detailed information on this medical condition, please refer to
the
>>>> two article links below, and/or Google "Osteo****osis, Iatrogenic
>>>> Cu****ng's
>>>> Syndrome, Addison's Disease, Steroid use, Kyphosis" and/or any
>>>> combination
>>>> of similar key words:
>>>>
>>>>
http://upmc.com/Services/MinimallyInvasiveendoNeurosurgeryCenter/Cond...
>>>>
>>>>
http://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/BHCV2/bhcarticles.nsf/pages/Hormon...
>>>>
>>>> This medical condition, with the way it caused Kennedy's upper body
to
>>>> be
>>>> rounded and angled forward with the anatomical "pu****ng forward" of
his
>>>> upper spine, upper chest, and head and neck, helps to place his lower
>>>> anterior neck where the exit wound was, *below* the upper back, and
in
>>>> line with the SBT shot at around Z-223.
>>>>
>>>> I believe this medical condition is one of the most under researched
>>>> (if
>>>> at all researched), but nevertheless im****tant, keys to understanding
>>>> the
>>>> SBT and how the bullet enters and p***** through Kennedy's upper back
>>>> and
>>>> exits where the Warren Commission said it did. I also believe this is
>>>> why
>>>> there was some confusion as to the placement of the actual wound on
>>>> charts
>>>> by the autopsists, and that measurements made from the mastoid
process
>>>> behind the right ear may have muddled a way to determine the exact
>>>> location when comparing it to the rest of Kennedy's upper back. In
>>>> other
>>>> words, in the confusion, and in hastily fini****ng the autopsy because
>>>> the
>>>> Kennedy family (especially Mrs. Kennedy) didn't want to leave
Bethesda
>>>> without the body, pathologists were simply mistaken in thinking the
>>>> bullet
>>>> hole might have been located at vertebra T3 or thereabouts because,
due
>>>> to
>>>> Kennedy's exaggerated spine curvature, T3 would appear higher on
>>>> Kennedy's
>>>> spine than on a normal spine. And, in the years since the
assassination
>>>> and with subsequent investigations such as the HSCA, the reason why
>>>> there
>>>> remains some confusion as to the actual placement of the bullet hole
is
>>>> because pathologists still have to rely on these hastily drawn
charts,
>>>> diagrams, and autopsy photos to try to re-determine where the bullet
>>>> hole
>>>> was located. And, of course, this confusion carries over to
researchers
>>>> studying the assassination and is the reason for the ongoing
>>>> controversy.
>>>>
>>>> So, if one measures the distance from the mastoid process behind
>>>> Kennedy's
>>>> right ear to the bullet hole, as was actually done at the autopsy,
>>>> because
>>>> of the exaggerated curvature of his upper spine placing his head and
>>>> neck
>>>> in a more forward position than a normal person, that distance is
going
>>>> to
>>>> be deceiving, even to a trained pathologist pressed for time, when
>>>> compared to measuring a more flat, straighter neck and upper spine.
>>>>
>>>> Iatrogenic Cu****ng's Syndrome can also help explain why the bullet
>>>> holes
>>>> in Kennedy's ****rt and jacket don't line up exactly with the actual
>>>> bullet
>>>> hole in his upper back, and why they may be further down:
>>>>
>>>> How ****rts and jackets are generally tailored, the way they drape
over
>>>> the
>>>> upper back from the collar on down on normal people (who, by the way,
>>>> all
>>>> have outward curves in their upper spines, though not as exaggerated
as
>>>> in
>>>> people with Iatrogenic Cu****ng's Syndrome) and compensating for the
>>>> exaggerated curve in Kennedy's upper spine -- this curve's rounded
>>>> measurement adding distance to the measurement of the ****rt and
jacket
>>>> fabric -- is why when we see pictures of his bloody ****rt and jacket
>>>> hanging straight down as opposed to being actually worn on him, and
>>>> when
>>>> measured from the collar straight down -- without the spinal curve --
>>>> the
>>>> holes in the ****rt and jacket appear lower.
>>>>
>>>> So to sum: Because Kennedy was not sitting straight up in the limo,
his
>>>> spine not on a completely vertical line at the time of the shot, and
>>>> that
>>>> he was slumped forward a bit not only because he sat that way
normally
>>>> as
>>>> some people do, (some more than others), but also because he was
>>>> suffering
>>>> from Iatrogenic Cu****ng's Syndrome that caused his upper chest, head,
>>>> and
>>>> neck area to slump forward somewhat, we can see and understand that
the
>>>> actual location of the entry wound, and the path of the bullet
through
>>>> his
>>>> upper body and out his lower anterior neck area, indeed does line up
>>>> with
>>>> the approximate 17 degree downward trajectory of the Warren
Commission
>>>> exhibit 399 bullet fired at around Z-223 from the easternmost window
of
>>>> the TSBD sixth floor sniper's nest.
>>>>
>>>> And one final thought: If conspiracists want to respond by saying
that
>>>> because they don't see a pronounced curve in Kennedy's upper back in
>>>> photos and film, therefore it didn't exist, this would be incorrect.
>>>> Iatrogenic Cu****ng's Syndrome is a real medical condition and is the
>>>> result of taking large doses of cortisone over long periods of time
in
>>>> the
>>>> treatment of Addison's Disease. In other words, although in Kennedy's
>>>> case
>>>> any Iatrogenic Cu****ng's Syndrome information is not publicly known
and
>>>> is
>>>> quite possibly undo***ented by his doctors (as far as I know), we can
>>>> safely infer that Kennedy did in fact suffer from Iatrogenic
Cu****ng's
>>>> Syndrome because he, in fact, took large doses of cortisone for
>>>> treatment
>>>> of his Addison's Disease.
>>>>
>>>> James
>>>
>>> The simplest explanation for the strange anomolies in Kennedy's wounds
>>> is that he was, in fact, shot from both the front and back. Easy! You
do
>>> get an award for coming up with the silliest explanation for the
>>> discrepencies I have heard so far! Looking on the bright side, at
least
>>> you are acknowledging that there IS a discrepency in the wounds that
has
>>> not been satisfactorily explained by Lone Nut theorists.
>>>
>>> How do you explain the Dr's at Parkland who stated/testified that
>>> Kennedy had a small entrance wound in his throat when he was brought
in
>>> after the shooting. Here is a quote by Dr Perry (who performed the
>>> tracheotomy) - the throat wound "was a very small injury, with
clearcut,
>>> although somewhat irregular margins of less than a quarter inch with
>>> minimal tissue damage surrounding it on the skin." Dr Charles Baxter:
>>> the wound in the throat "was no more than a pinpoint. It was made by a
>>> small caliber weapon. And it was an entry wound."
>>>
>>> My own opinion, sure to be ridiculed by the lone nut brigade I'm sure,
>>> is that he was shot in the throat by a flechette (just as he passed
>>> umbrella man) This rendered him unable to move (as you see in the
>>> Zapruder film - his injuries up until that point would not have caused
>>> him to react the way he did) The poison was untraceable, and explains
>>> why the doctors and nurses at Parkland all described the small
entrance
>>> wound in Kennedy's throat, and the lack of corresponding exit wound in
>>> the back of his neck, along with no recovered bullet.
>>>
>>>
>>
>


|
60 Posts in Topic:
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-04-26 21:25:15 |
|
Herbert Blenner <a1eah |
2008-04-27 12:08:44 |
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-04-27 21:25:18 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-04-27 21:31:09 |
|
Herbert Blenner <a1eah |
2008-04-28 17:17:52 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-04-29 18:02:14 |
|
Herbert Blenner <a1eah |
2008-04-28 17:18:31 |
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-04-29 01:28:13 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-04-29 18:11:37 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-04-30 14:04:24 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-04-30 23:15:26 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-05-02 00:45:29 |
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-04-30 23:11:09 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-05-01 01:44:47 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-05-02 00:42:55 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-05-05 01:59:15 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-05-06 21:30:53 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-04-29 18:01:42 |
|
Herbert Blenner <a1eah |
2008-04-29 11:23:59 |
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-04-29 20:28:39 |
|
Cliff <nksy@[EMAIL PRO |
2008-04-29 11:26:09 |
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-04-29 20:29:00 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-04-30 14:01:20 |
|
Herbert Blenner <a1eah |
2008-04-30 14:04:39 |
|
Herbert Blenner <a1eah |
2008-04-30 23:06:24 |
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-05-01 22:51:39 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-05-02 00:52:18 |
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-05-03 23:17:12 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-05-02 10:36:10 |
|
Herbert Blenner <a1eah |
2008-04-30 23:09:40 |
|
Herbert Blenner <a1eah |
2008-05-01 01:40:11 |
|
Herbert Blenner <a1eah |
2008-05-01 01:41:12 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-05-02 00:43:50 |
|
Herbert Blenner <a1eah |
2008-05-03 01:14:46 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-04-27 21:31:57 |
|
thaliacole@[EMAIL PROTECT |
2008-04-28 17:15:05 |
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-04-29 01:28:52 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-04-29 13:21:53 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-04-29 18:12:12 |
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-04-30 23:13:03 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-05-01 01:45:12 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-05-02 00:48:10 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-05-02 19:20:06 |
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-05-03 23:17:34 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-05-04 18:34:48 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-05-04 21:17:01 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-05-05 01:59:27 |
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-05-05 22:41:06 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-05-06 12:56:58 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-05-01 01:48:19 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-05-01 22:53:14 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-05-02 00:52:36 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-05-02 10:35:25 |
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-05-03 23:18:28 |
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-05-03 23:22:35 |
|
thaliacole@[EMAIL PROTECT |
2008-05-01 01:46:53 |
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-05-01 22:51:10 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-05-02 00:52:06 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-05-02 10:36:20 |
|
thaliacole@[EMAIL PROTECT |
2008-05-05 11:06:15 |
|
Post A Reply:

|
|
|
|