Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Assassination JFK > Re: JFK minus t...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 28 of 28 Topic 10334 of 11238
Post > Topic >>

Re: JFK minus the Spin

by "tomnln" <tomnln@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 2, 2008 at 07:20 PM

It's all HERE>>>   http://whokilledjfk.net/catch_of_the_day.htm



"yeuhd" <walloon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:ff2dbf7c-e646-44f9-bec5-bc693c8b92d3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 May 1, 11:47 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> It ALSO states that neither of those flights would get Oswald to the
> counsulate in time that
day>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/catch_of_the_day.htm

You're under the mistaken apprehension that Oswald for some reason of
timing was *required* to have visited the Soviet Consulate on his day
of arrival in Helsinki (Saturday, October 10, 1959). Not so. The
Warren Commission was merely trying to narrow down when he DID first
visit the Soviet Consulate. We know that he arrived in Helsinki on
Saturday. So the question was: did he also visit the Soviet Consulate
that day and fill out an application for a tourist visa? The answer,
after a little research: probably not. The consulate probably closed
at noon on Saturdays in 1959. So he probably first visited the
consulate on Monday.

> You STILL have NOT proven Oswald took a secondary flight to Helsinki.

No, just shown that two regularly scheduled connecting flights from
London to Helsinki were available for Oswald to take. And that both
flights would have gotten him to Helsinki before 6 p.m.

> Apparently you think you're Smarter than the WC/CIA/HSCA.

What are you talking about? Do you even read your own citations? The
Warren Commission was the one who *re****ted* the existence of those
two flights.

And the CIA, on July 1, 1964, said only that they had found no DIRECT
flights from London to Helsinki that would have gotten Oswald to his
hotel before midnight, and that they were going to look next into
*indirect* flights. Obviously, they found them: see footnote 480 on p.
862 of the Warren Commission Re****t.

And your mention of the HSCA is a non sequitur: the HSCA did not even
discuss Oswald's passage from New Orleans to Moscow.
 




 28 Posts in Topic:
JFK minus the Spin
pin head <longiislandh  2008-04-27 23:05:35 
Re: JFK minus the Spin
WhiskyJoe <jremv@[EMAI  2008-04-28 17:17:44 
Re: JFK minus the Spin
Anthony Marsh <anthony  2008-04-29 18:02:58 
Re: JFK minus the Spin
thaliacole@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-04-28 17:18:39 
Re: JFK minus the Spin
Anthony Marsh <anthony  2008-04-29 18:01:17 
Re: JFK minus the Spin
"Jas" <jstel  2008-04-28 22:22:02 
Re: JFK minus the Spin
curtjester1 <curtjeste  2008-04-28 22:23:03 
Re: JFK minus the Spin
Anthony Marsh <anthony  2008-04-28 22:23:28 
Re: JFK minus the Spin
yeuhd <walloon@[EMAIL   2008-04-29 20:29:22 
Re: JFK minus the Spin
"tomnln" <to  2008-04-30 13:58:48 
Re: JFK minus the Spin
"Jas" <jstel  2008-04-30 23:10:45 
Re: JFK minus the Spin
"tomnln" <to  2008-05-01 01:44:01 
Re: JFK minus the Spin
pin head <longiislandh  2008-04-30 22:58:16 
Re: JFK minus the Spin
pin head <longiislandh  2008-04-30 23:07:50 
Re: JFK minus the Spin
Anthony Marsh <anthony  2008-05-02 00:49:02 
Re: JFK minus the Spin
yeuhd <walloon@[EMAIL   2008-04-30 23:14:03 
Re: JFK minus the Spin
"tomnln" <to  2008-05-01 01:46:17 
Re: JFK minus the Spin
yeuhd <walloon@[EMAIL   2008-05-01 17:44:02 
Re: JFK minus the Spin
"tomnln" <to  2008-05-02 00:47:46 
Re: JFK minus the Spin
yeuhd <walloon@[EMAIL   2008-05-01 17:44:34 
Re: JFK minus the Spin
yeuhd <walloon@[EMAIL   2008-05-01 17:48:27 
Re: JFK minus the Spin
yeuhd <walloon@[EMAIL   2008-05-01 17:49:36 
Re: JFK minus the Spin
Anthony Marsh <anthony  2008-05-02 19:17:12 
Re: JFK minus the Spin
yeuhd <walloon@[EMAIL   2008-05-01 22:45:08 
Re: JFK minus the Spin
"tomnln" <to  2008-05-02 00:53:47 
Re: JFK minus the Spin
yeuhd <walloon@[EMAIL   2008-05-02 09:49:23 
Re: JFK minus the Spin
"tomnln" <to  2008-05-02 19:19:26 
Re: JFK minus the Spin
"tomnln" <to  2008-05-02 19:20:36 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Oct 12 0:17:16 CDT 2008.