Re: JFK, Addison's Disease, Iatrogenic Cu****ng's Syndrome, and the

On May 2, 12:52=A0am, "tomnln" <tom...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Sounds like Jas is Running AGAIN.

James is running because he has no rebuttal to my argument. I wrote:

Source: Punching Holes, Appendix 3 - Considerations of a back to neck 
perforating wound

Descriptions of Kennedy's neck wound by the Parkland doctors emphasized 
roundness over ovalness. In particular, Dr. Carrico, who inserted a 
breathing tube past the bullet hole, called the neck wound rather round. 
Dr. Perry who performed the tracheotomy described the wound as roughly 
spherical to oval and his assistant, Dr. Baxter, observed a spherical 
wound whose ovalness was not worth mentioning. These observations infer an

incidence angle no more than 20 degree.

http://mysite.verizon.net/a1eah71/punchingholes_files/perforating.jpg

The observations of a round to a slightly oval bullet hole in Kennedy's 
neck enable a feasibility study of various trajectories. Referring to the 
above graphic, P'R' represents the perpendicular to the exit site. 
Directions P'Q' and P'Q'' make equal angles with the perpendicular and 
bound a family of trajectories consistent with the observations of the 
Parkland doctors. This particular construction uses an angle of 20 degree.

Extrapolating the direction P'Q'' to point A on the back yields the 
highest entry site for this particular family. Drawing the perpendicular, 
BA, to point A enables measurement of the incidence angle as 30 degree. So

this initial lowering of the entry site has increased the incidence angle 
by 10 degree, nearly half the required 22-degree increase for agreement 
with the 42-degree incidence angle derived from dimensions of the 7 mm by 
4 mm oval bullet hole. Extending the perpendicular to the exit site, P'R',

to point D yields a lower entry site. Although the direction of the trial 
trajectory, FD at point D is steeper than the trajectory at point A, CA, 
the curvature of the back changes the directions of the perpendiculars. So

drawing the perpendicular to point D, ED, and measuring the incidence 
angle of 33 degree shows that curvature of the back effectively frustrates

finding a reasonable entry point for an upright victim as shown in the 
drawing.

Although this mental exercise failed to find a lower entry site consistent

with the dimensions of the bullet hole, the consideration of curvature 
suggests an alternate procedure. Namely bowing the head on a biophysically

accurate model to increase the incidence angle at a trial entry site by 
raising the perpendicular. If this method should find a consistent entry 
site then rotations of the torso and bowed head as a unit about the hips 
could bring the trial trajectory into alignment with the real trajectory 
between shooter and victim. End of source.

James replied: "Do me another favor. Read the original post before you 
post your blather, either that or start another thread."

Herbert