

|
 |
| << Topic |
< Post |
Post 54 of 60 Topic 10328 of 11035
|
Post > |
Topic >> |
Re: JFK, Addison's Disease, Iatrogenic Cu****ng's Syndrome, and the
by "Jas" <jstell1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
May 3, 2008 at 11:18 PM
| Anthony Marsh wrote: "Make sure that you have read Robert Dallek's article
in the December 2002 Atlantic Monthly:"
http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/2002/12/dallek.htm
AM, thank you for posting this link.
James
"tomnln" <tomnln@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:WDvSj.111811$Ft5.17494@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Anthony Marsh" <anthony_marsh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:FPydnRtAksSlq4fVnZ2dnUVZ_uednZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> tomnln wrote:
>>> Jas;
>>>
>>> The Parkland Dr.s handled an average of 1271 gunshot victime per year.
>>>
>>> Humnes/Boswell never performed an autopsy in their lives.
>>>
>>> Which ones do you think was better qualified to evaluate the
Presidents
>>> wounds?
>>>
>>
>> The ER doctors did not evaluate the President's wounds. They were too
>> busy trying to save his life. ER doctors routinely make mistakes about
>> gunshot wounds.
>
>
> Please PROVE that the Parkland Dr's were "mistaken"?
>
> Then list the attributes of the Bethesda Dr's?
>
>
>
>
>>> "Jas" <jstell1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:4816adba$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> thaliacole wrote: "How do you explain the Dr's at Parkland who
>>>> stated/testified that Kennedy had a small entrance wound in his
throat
>>>> when he was brought in after the shooting."
>>>>
>>>> The Parkland doctors were trauma doctors pressed for time and
occupied
>>>> with saving Kennedy's life. Noting wounds on Kennedy's body, and
going
>>>> into detailed examination was impossible and only cursory at best.
They
>>>> neither had the time nor the authority to go any further with any
>>>> examination. The autopsy pathologists were the ones to do that at the
>>>> autopsy at Bethesda.
>>>>
>>>> thaliacole also wrote: "The simplest explanation for the strange
>>>> anomolies in Kennedy's wounds is that he was, in fact, shot from both
>>>> the front and back. Easy! You do get an award for coming up with the
>>>> silliest explanation for the discrepencies I have heard so far!"
>>>>
>>>> Why, thank you for that. How nice of you. I'll tell you this much,
and
>>>> this is all I'll tell you so as not to waste any more of my time --
my
>>>> ideas make a whole lot more sense than your "he was shot in the
throat
>>>> by a flechette" statement.
>>>>
>>>> Your statement doesn't even deserve a response, except, "good grief
>>>> man, get a grip."
>>>>
>>>> And, by the way, what in the world does your point have to do with
the
>>>> curvature of Kennedy's upper back due to cortisone use sup****ting the
>>>> SBT? If you want to spout off about your "flechette," start your own
>>>> thread.
>>>>
>>>> James
>>>>
>>>> <thaliacole@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>
news:80931670-951b-4d51-b4b9-ca66882274a5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> On Apr 27, 9:25 am, "Jas" <jste...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>> As we know, there's a lot of controversy stirred up by conspiracists
>>>>> over
>>>>> Kennedy's back wound location and whether a single bullet fired by
>>>>> Oswald
>>>>> from the sixth floor TSBD could pass through and out his lower
>>>>> anterior
>>>>> neck, (if, according to them, it p***** out at all), and goes on
>>>>> through
>>>>> Connally, through his right wrist, into his left leg, and ending up
on
>>>>> a
>>>>> stretcher at Parkland Hospital -- the Single Bullet Theory, CE 399.
>>>>> Conspiracists maintain that the upper body bullet trajectory isn't
on
>>>>> a
>>>>> downward path because the exit wound in the lower throat is higher
>>>>> than
>>>>> the upper back, therefore another bullet hit Kennedy in the throat
>>>>> from
>>>>> the front, and they say the autopsists found the bullet hole in
>>>>> Kennedy's
>>>>> upper back positioned lower on his back than the Warren Commission
>>>>> did.
>>>>>
>>>>> Conspiracists also say that the bullet hit Kennedy lower than the
>>>>> Warren
>>>>> Commission and its defenders say it did, because the bullet holes in
>>>>> his
>>>>> ****rt and jacket are lower than the Commission said, therefore it
was
>>>>> a
>>>>> shot from somewhere other than the TSBD, possibly the Dal-Tex
>>>>> building.
>>>>> They say this can be proven by where his ****rt and jacket were
located
>>>>> on
>>>>> his back -- "bunched up," or "not bunched up" -- at the time of the
CE
>>>>> 399
>>>>> shot at around Z-223.
>>>>>
>>>>> For conspiracists to use these perceived viewpoints as "evidence" or
>>>>> proof
>>>>> of other shooters in Dealey Plaza in trying to prove the SBT
invalid,
>>>>> is
>>>>> wrong. Other than the fact that there were indeed mistakes, changes,
>>>>> and
>>>>> some confusion in the autopsists re****ts and testimonies regarding
the
>>>>> actual location of the upper back bullet hole, I feel the reason for
>>>>> the
>>>>> confusion was not because of a cover-up and conspiracy, but because
of
>>>>> a
>>>>> condition I believe Kennedy suffered from known as Iatrogenic
>>>>> Cu****ng's
>>>>> Syndrome.
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately I can't verify this by citing re****ts and do***ents
>>>>> because
>>>>> I don't have access to Kennedy's confidential medical records, nor
do
>>>>> I
>>>>> have charts and diagrams with the actual mathematical measurements
of
>>>>> the
>>>>> curves of his spine while he is sitting in the back seat of his
limo,
>>>>> the
>>>>> likes of which I highly doubt were done by his doctors in the first
>>>>> place.
>>>>> But from Kennedy's known medical condition and certain known medical
>>>>> facts, I can draw a solid inference that he suffered from this
>>>>> disorder,
>>>>> and that this can help to understand how the SBT can, and does,
work.
>>>>>
>>>>> What I do have is the known fact that Kennedy suffered from
Addison's
>>>>> Disease, had for many years and indeed almost died from it, and the
>>>>> fact
>>>>> that he was prescribed large doses of cortisone to treat it. I also
>>>>> have
>>>>> the known medical fact that intake of large doses of cortisone, over
>>>>> time,
>>>>> causes osteo****osis and a condition known as Iatrogenic Cu****ng's
>>>>> Syndrome, an exaggerated outward curving of the upper spine and
>>>>> forward
>>>>> positioning of the chest, head and neck area (also called Kyphosis).
>>>>>
>>>>> For detailed information on this medical condition, please refer to
>>>>> the
>>>>> two article links below, and/or Google "Osteo****osis, Iatrogenic
>>>>> Cu****ng's
>>>>> Syndrome, Addison's Disease, Steroid use, Kyphosis" and/or any
>>>>> combination
>>>>> of similar key words:
>>>>>
>>>>>
http://upmc.com/Services/MinimallyInvasiveendoNeurosurgeryCenter/Cond...
>>>>>
>>>>>
http://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/BHCV2/bhcarticles.nsf/pages/Hormon...
>>>>>
>>>>> This medical condition, with the way it caused Kennedy's upper body
to
>>>>> be
>>>>> rounded and angled forward with the anatomical "pu****ng forward" of
>>>>> his
>>>>> upper spine, upper chest, and head and neck, helps to place his
lower
>>>>> anterior neck where the exit wound was, *below* the upper back, and
in
>>>>> line with the SBT shot at around Z-223.
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe this medical condition is one of the most under researched
>>>>> (if
>>>>> at all researched), but nevertheless im****tant, keys to
understanding
>>>>> the
>>>>> SBT and how the bullet enters and p***** through Kennedy's upper
back
>>>>> and
>>>>> exits where the Warren Commission said it did. I also believe this
is
>>>>> why
>>>>> there was some confusion as to the placement of the actual wound on
>>>>> charts
>>>>> by the autopsists, and that measurements made from the mastoid
process
>>>>> behind the right ear may have muddled a way to determine the exact
>>>>> location when comparing it to the rest of Kennedy's upper back. In
>>>>> other
>>>>> words, in the confusion, and in hastily fini****ng the autopsy
because
>>>>> the
>>>>> Kennedy family (especially Mrs. Kennedy) didn't want to leave
Bethesda
>>>>> without the body, pathologists were simply mistaken in thinking the
>>>>> bullet
>>>>> hole might have been located at vertebra T3 or thereabouts because,
>>>>> due to
>>>>> Kennedy's exaggerated spine curvature, T3 would appear higher on
>>>>> Kennedy's
>>>>> spine than on a normal spine. And, in the years since the
>>>>> assassination
>>>>> and with subsequent investigations such as the HSCA, the reason why
>>>>> there
>>>>> remains some confusion as to the actual placement of the bullet hole
>>>>> is
>>>>> because pathologists still have to rely on these hastily drawn
charts,
>>>>> diagrams, and autopsy photos to try to re-determine where the bullet
>>>>> hole
>>>>> was located. And, of course, this confusion carries over to
>>>>> researchers
>>>>> studying the assassination and is the reason for the ongoing
>>>>> controversy.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, if one measures the distance from the mastoid process behind
>>>>> Kennedy's
>>>>> right ear to the bullet hole, as was actually done at the autopsy,
>>>>> because
>>>>> of the exaggerated curvature of his upper spine placing his head and
>>>>> neck
>>>>> in a more forward position than a normal person, that distance is
>>>>> going to
>>>>> be deceiving, even to a trained pathologist pressed for time, when
>>>>> compared to measuring a more flat, straighter neck and upper spine.
>>>>>
>>>>> Iatrogenic Cu****ng's Syndrome can also help explain why the bullet
>>>>> holes
>>>>> in Kennedy's ****rt and jacket don't line up exactly with the actual
>>>>> bullet
>>>>> hole in his upper back, and why they may be further down:
>>>>>
>>>>> How ****rts and jackets are generally tailored, the way they drape
over
>>>>> the
>>>>> upper back from the collar on down on normal people (who, by the
way,
>>>>> all
>>>>> have outward curves in their upper spines, though not as exaggerated
>>>>> as in
>>>>> people with Iatrogenic Cu****ng's Syndrome) and compensating for the
>>>>> exaggerated curve in Kennedy's upper spine -- this curve's rounded
>>>>> measurement adding distance to the measurement of the ****rt and
jacket
>>>>> fabric -- is why when we see pictures of his bloody ****rt and jacket
>>>>> hanging straight down as opposed to being actually worn on him, and
>>>>> when
>>>>> measured from the collar straight down -- without the spinal curve
--
>>>>> the
>>>>> holes in the ****rt and jacket appear lower.
>>>>>
>>>>> So to sum: Because Kennedy was not sitting straight up in the limo,
>>>>> his
>>>>> spine not on a completely vertical line at the time of the shot, and
>>>>> that
>>>>> he was slumped forward a bit not only because he sat that way
normally
>>>>> as
>>>>> some people do, (some more than others), but also because he was
>>>>> suffering
>>>>> from Iatrogenic Cu****ng's Syndrome that caused his upper chest,
head,
>>>>> and
>>>>> neck area to slump forward somewhat, we can see and understand that
>>>>> the
>>>>> actual location of the entry wound, and the path of the bullet
through
>>>>> his
>>>>> upper body and out his lower anterior neck area, indeed does line up
>>>>> with
>>>>> the approximate 17 degree downward trajectory of the Warren
Commission
>>>>> exhibit 399 bullet fired at around Z-223 from the easternmost window
>>>>> of
>>>>> the TSBD sixth floor sniper's nest.
>>>>>
>>>>> And one final thought: If conspiracists want to respond by saying
that
>>>>> because they don't see a pronounced curve in Kennedy's upper back in
>>>>> photos and film, therefore it didn't exist, this would be incorrect.
>>>>> Iatrogenic Cu****ng's Syndrome is a real medical condition and is the
>>>>> result of taking large doses of cortisone over long periods of time
in
>>>>> the
>>>>> treatment of Addison's Disease. In other words, although in
Kennedy's
>>>>> case
>>>>> any Iatrogenic Cu****ng's Syndrome information is not publicly known
>>>>> and is
>>>>> quite possibly undo***ented by his doctors (as far as I know), we
can
>>>>> safely infer that Kennedy did in fact suffer from Iatrogenic
Cu****ng's
>>>>> Syndrome because he, in fact, took large doses of cortisone for
>>>>> treatment
>>>>> of his Addison's Disease.
>>>>>
>>>>> James
>>>>
>>>> The simplest explanation for the strange anomolies in Kennedy's
wounds
>>>> is that he was, in fact, shot from both the front and back. Easy! You
>>>> do get an award for coming up with the silliest explanation for the
>>>> discrepencies I have heard so far! Looking on the bright side, at
least
>>>> you are acknowledging that there IS a discrepency in the wounds that
>>>> has not been satisfactorily explained by Lone Nut theorists.
>>>>
>>>> How do you explain the Dr's at Parkland who stated/testified that
>>>> Kennedy had a small entrance wound in his throat when he was brought
in
>>>> after the shooting. Here is a quote by Dr Perry (who performed the
>>>> tracheotomy) - the throat wound "was a very small injury, with
>>>> clearcut, although somewhat irregular margins of less than a quarter
>>>> inch with minimal tissue damage surrounding it on the skin." Dr
Charles
>>>> Baxter: the wound in the throat "was no more than a pinpoint. It was
>>>> made by a small caliber weapon. And it was an entry wound."
>>>>
>>>> My own opinion, sure to be ridiculed by the lone nut brigade I'm
sure,
>>>> is that he was shot in the throat by a flechette (just as he passed
>>>> umbrella man) This rendered him unable to move (as you see in the
>>>> Zapruder film - his injuries up until that point would not have
caused
>>>> him to react the way he did) The poison was untraceable, and explains
>>>> why the doctors and nurses at Parkland all described the small
entrance
>>>> wound in Kennedy's throat, and the lack of corresponding exit wound
in
>>>> the back of his neck, along with no recovered bullet.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>


|
60 Posts in Topic:
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-04-26 21:25:15 |
|
Herbert Blenner <a1eah |
2008-04-27 12:08:44 |
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-04-27 21:25:18 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-04-27 21:31:09 |
|
Herbert Blenner <a1eah |
2008-04-28 17:17:52 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-04-29 18:02:14 |
|
Herbert Blenner <a1eah |
2008-04-28 17:18:31 |
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-04-29 01:28:13 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-04-29 18:11:37 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-04-30 14:04:24 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-04-30 23:15:26 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-05-02 00:45:29 |
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-04-30 23:11:09 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-05-01 01:44:47 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-05-02 00:42:55 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-05-05 01:59:15 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-05-06 21:30:53 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-04-29 18:01:42 |
|
Herbert Blenner <a1eah |
2008-04-29 11:23:59 |
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-04-29 20:28:39 |
|
Cliff <nksy@[EMAIL PRO |
2008-04-29 11:26:09 |
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-04-29 20:29:00 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-04-30 14:01:20 |
|
Herbert Blenner <a1eah |
2008-04-30 14:04:39 |
|
Herbert Blenner <a1eah |
2008-04-30 23:06:24 |
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-05-01 22:51:39 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-05-02 00:52:18 |
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-05-03 23:17:12 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-05-02 10:36:10 |
|
Herbert Blenner <a1eah |
2008-04-30 23:09:40 |
|
Herbert Blenner <a1eah |
2008-05-01 01:40:11 |
|
Herbert Blenner <a1eah |
2008-05-01 01:41:12 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-05-02 00:43:50 |
|
Herbert Blenner <a1eah |
2008-05-03 01:14:46 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-04-27 21:31:57 |
|
thaliacole@[EMAIL PROTECT |
2008-04-28 17:15:05 |
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-04-29 01:28:52 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-04-29 13:21:53 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-04-29 18:12:12 |
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-04-30 23:13:03 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-05-01 01:45:12 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-05-02 00:48:10 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-05-02 19:20:06 |
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-05-03 23:17:34 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-05-04 18:34:48 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-05-04 21:17:01 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-05-05 01:59:27 |
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-05-05 22:41:06 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-05-06 12:56:58 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-05-01 01:48:19 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-05-01 22:53:14 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-05-02 00:52:36 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-05-02 10:35:25 |
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-05-03 23:18:28 |
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-05-03 23:22:35 |
|
thaliacole@[EMAIL PROTECT |
2008-05-01 01:46:53 |
|
"Jas" <jstel |
2008-05-01 22:51:10 |
|
"tomnln" <to |
2008-05-02 00:52:06 |
|
Anthony Marsh <anthony |
2008-05-02 10:36:20 |
|
thaliacole@[EMAIL PROTECT |
2008-05-05 11:06:15 |
|
Post A Reply:

|
|
|
|