Re: Statement from Judyth Baker

On May 3, 12:24=A0am, howardp <ho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > Seems she is still sticking with the SV-40 stuff. =A0From my essay:
>
> > <quote on>
>
> > "Deadly Alliance" says that the virus in the =93cocktail=94 on which
the=

> > little band of researchers was working was the AIDS virus, but she
> > told various Dutch media outlets that she was working with SV-40
> > (Simian Virus 40).
>
> "Deadly Alliance" is either an early draft I worked on or the title of
an
> outline I had made for research purposes alone. The one you and Reitzes
> have later doubled in length, was much clarified, and then was
> discontinued. As I just informed Reitzes, neither were intended for
> publication. If there is anything out there that says she was working
with=

> the AIDS virus, it is wrong. This was just my feeble mind trying to make
> sense of all she was saying and writing in a relatively short amount of
> time. I have more accurately been descibing SV-40 -- especially the
> mutated form of it "serendipidously" created by Dr. Sherman -- as a
virus
> that breaks down the immune system LIKE AIDS. Haslam has his own
thoughts
> about which I am not expert enough to comment.
>
> Freshen up your Web site, Herr Professor.
>
> Please tell me you will stop stealing private e-mails, not to mention
> publi****ng copyrighted do***ents.
>

You know that is not going to happen.  Team McAdams will stop at nothing 
to try to dig up dirt on Judyth.  Seems they can't afford to play by the 
rules -- maybe they think the stakes are too high.