Re: Statement from Judyth Baker

jfk297x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> On May 3, 12:24 am, howardp <ho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> Seems she is still sticking with the SV-40 stuff.  From my essay:
>>> <quote on>
>>> "Deadly Alliance" says that the virus in the =93cocktail=94 on which =
the
>>> little band of researchers was working was the AIDS virus, but she
>>> told various Dutch media outlets that she was working with SV-40
>>> (Simian Virus 40).
>> "Deadly Alliance" is either an early draft I worked on or the title of=
 an
>> outline I had made for research purposes alone. The one you and Reitze=
s
>> have later doubled in length, was much clarified, and then was
>> discontinued. As I just informed Reitzes, neither were intended for
>> publication. If there is anything out there that says she was working =
with
>> the AIDS virus, it is wrong. This was just my feeble mind trying to ma=
ke
>> sense of all she was saying and writing in a relatively short amount o=
f
>> time. I have more accurately been descibing SV-40 -- especially the
>> mutated form of it "serendipidously" created by Dr. Sherman -- as a vi=
rus
>> that breaks down the immune system LIKE AIDS. Haslam has his own thoug=
hts
>> about which I am not expert enough to comment.
>>
>> Freshen up your Web site, Herr Professor.
>>
>> Please tell me you will stop stealing private e-mails, not to mention
>> publi****ng copyrighted do***ents.
>>
>=20
> You know that is not going to happen.  Team McAdams will stop at nothin=
g=20
> to try to dig up dirt on Judyth.  Seems they can't afford to play by th=
e=20
> rules -- maybe they think the stakes are too high.
>=20


They honestly think that all they need to do is discredit a source and=20
that alone proves that there was no conspiracy. Physical evidence means=20
nothing to them.