Re: JUDYTH: National Science Foundation scholar****p and grants

On May 4, 7:39=A0pm, Anthony Marsh <anthony_ma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Barb Junkkarinen wrote:
> > On 3 May 2008 01:17:43 -0400, howardp <ho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> On May 2, 10:35 am, Anthony Marsh <anthony_ma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>> Dave Reitzes wrote:
> >>>> On May 1, 10:52?pm, kbs88...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> >>>>> On Apr 30, 10:16?pm, "paul seaton"
<paulNOseatonS...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>=

> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> Howard,
> >>>>>> First, my cards on the table : I don't believe the 'interesting'
pa=
rts of
> >>>>>> Judyth's story - I mean her supposed connection to LHO & Ferrie &
a=
ll
> >>>>>> that, though I do think it's clear she was a very bright student,
a=
nd did
> >>>>>> work at Reilly.
> >>>>>> Now, what I want to ask you is , what ( aside from JVB's body
langu=
age )
> >>>>>> actual hard physical evidence convinces you of the truth of her
sto=
ry - ie
> >>>>>> what -for you - kills the hypothesis that she basically just made
u=
p the
> >>>>>> whole JFK connection ?
> >>>>>> It would be interesting if you could boil your belief down to a
fin=
ite
> >>>>>> hard core of key facts that swing you in her favour. I should say
t=
hat -
> >>>>>> in my state of ignorance, not having read her book - I am under
the=

> >>>>>> impression that there are no such facts.
> >>>>>> Paul S
> >>>>>> ps: post also cc'ddirect to Howard
> >>>>> I just wanted to jump in here for a second to say that I really am
> >>>>> enjoying all of these JUDYTH threads. I've only made a few posts
in =
the
> >>>>> JFK group but have read a lot of the information here. The reason
th=
e
> >>>>> JUDYTH threads are so interesting to me is that they cover a
recent
> >>>>> addition to the JFK saga. The books you see on Amazon.com cover
part=
s of
> >>>>> the assassination that have been gone over with a fine tooth comb
fo=
r
> >>>>> years. However, the investigative work that Barb is doing is up to
t=
he
> >>>>> minute new information and it's great to see all the
correspondence
> >>>>> unfold. I just want to say thanks to Barb for going through all
the
> >>>>> trouble to get to the truth (whether it sup****ts or damages
Judyth's=

> >>>>> story) and placing it on a public forum for critical review.
> >>>> Barb is doing a terrific job. It's a pity no one bothered to do any
> >>> Barb's only goal is to dig up dirt.
>
> >>>> serious research into Judyth's background BEFORE the History
Channel =
ran
> >>> It's a pity that no one bothered to do any serious fact checking
befor=
e
> >>> her book was published. It's a pity that 99.99% of the bandwidth
here =
is
> >>> wasted on attacking Judyth.
>
> >>>> an entire hour-long do***entary on her claims and a number of
people
> >>>> shelled out fifty bucks for her book.
> >>>> Dave- Hide quoted text -
> >>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> >>> - Show quoted text -
> >> It is AMAZING, really. For a number of reasons, Judyth has made few
> >> converts. So why does she attract so much attention, one wonders?
=A0Yo=
u all
> >> treat Judyth as if it was like shooting fish in a bottle. So why DO
you=
 go
> >> on? =A0Is it a kind of sadism? Is this truly worth your time?
>
> > Supposedly, we're all involved in this arena in the first place
> > because we care about the truth of the JFK assassination ... and an
> > accurate history.
>
> No, Team McAdams thinks that by discrediting Judyth they prove that
> there was no conspiracy.

And by doing so with everything connected to a conspiracy, they leave
nothing to 'believe' in but the greatest hoax of all, the WCR.