Re: ANY COMMENTS

On 5 May 2008 01:56:07 -0400, "tomnln" <tomnln@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>
>"John McAdams" <john.mcadams@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>news:5q0t14htk46qh0958jl72s7t3fq21d0fqa@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On 4 May 2008 20:34:39 -0400, "tomnln" <tomnln@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"garyb" <garyn2000@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>news:da4fc759-c9ec-4564-8e45-d971419d1d4c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>On May 3, 8:28 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> ANY COMMENTS
>>>> Top Item
>>>>
>>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/catch_of_the_day.htm
>>>
>>>Interesting. Can you identify that first do***ent further?
>>>
>>>
>>>From Either the ARRB or, the Warrten Commission's Do***ents. (550,000)
>>>
>>>I believe it's from the ARRB.
>>
>> But who and what from the ARRB?
>>
>> Put it in context.  Who is asserting these things?  Some crackpot?
>>
>> .John
>> --------------
>> http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
>
>
>
>When McAdams gets caught short on official records he pleads "Ignorance".
>
>Is this your admission that you're NOT familiar with the ARRB Re****t
John?
>

Sashay(tm)!!

It's not from the ARRB Re****t.  It may be from an ARRB do***ent.  If
so, you need to explain what do***ent.

We know what evasion means.

It means you are trying to conceal the true source of the do***ent.

..John
--------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm