On 5 May 2008 22:38:05 -0400, "tomnln" <tomnln@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Is this your Denial that the page is from the ARRB John?
>
>You supposedly teach the subject on a University level for GOD's sake.
>
>You should recognize it before anyone else.
>
>Whaty "Consessions" will you make if I PINPOINT the origin of the page
>posted?
>
>If I'm gonna do the Research for a University professor there HAS to be a
>RFeward.
>
>
Sashay(tm)!!!
It's obvious to everybody why you won't explain the origin of this.
It's some source that has no credibility, but you want people to
accept it at face value.
You are concealing information.
That's not how honest research is done.
You are playing silly games, and everybody here knows it.
>
>"John McAdams" <john.mcadams@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:ec8t14dsrq9f7jki8mfhlm8bor81a31li7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On 5 May 2008 01:56:07 -0400, "tomnln" <tomnln@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"John McAdams" <john.mcadams@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>news:5q0t14htk46qh0958jl72s7t3fq21d0fqa@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> On 4 May 2008 20:34:39 -0400, "tomnln" <tomnln@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"garyb" <garyn2000@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>news:da4fc759-c9ec-4564-8e45-d971419d1d4c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>On May 3, 8:28 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>> ANY COMMENTS
>>>>>> Top Item
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/catch_of_the_day.htm
>>>>>
>>>>>Interesting. Can you identify that first do***ent further?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>From Either the ARRB or, the Warrten Commission's Do***ents.
(550,000)
>>>>>
>>>>>I believe it's from the ARRB.
>>>>
>>>> But who and what from the ARRB?
>>>>
>>>> Put it in context. Who is asserting these things? Some crackpot?
>>>>
>>>> .John
>>>> --------------
>>>> http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>When McAdams gets caught short on official records he pleads
"Ignorance".
>>>
>>>Is this your admission that you're NOT familiar with the ARRB Re****t
John?
>>>
>>
>> Sashay(tm)!!
>>
>> It's not from the ARRB Re****t. It may be from an ARRB do***ent. If
>> so, you need to explain what do***ent.
>>
>> We know what evasion means.
>>
>> It means you are trying to conceal the true source of the do***ent.
>>
>> .John
>> --------------
>> http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
..John
--------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
|
