Re: JUDYTH: National Science Foundation scholar****p and grants

jfk297x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> On May 5, 9:05 pm, William Yates <william_yates...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>> jfk2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>>> On May 4, 10:44 pm, "paul seaton" <paulNOseatonS...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> wrote:
>>>> <jfk2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>
news:488b7357-9f6f-410a-ab75-7dd96e97c757@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> On May 2, 6:25 pm, gateway...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Dixie M Dea) wrote:
>>>>> Anthony said.....
>>>>> Barb's only goal is to dig up dirt.
>>>>> It's a pity that no one bothered to do any serious fact checking
before
>>>>> her book was published. It's a pity that 99.99% of the bandwidth
here is
>>>>> wasted on attacking Judyth.
>>>>> __________________________________
>>>>> Barb's only goal is in one thing and that is in learning, the
>>>>> truth.....just as most of us want to know. There is no dirt digging
going
>>>>> on.
>>>> If only that were so.  Barb is making a good research effort, but she
>>>> doesn't know what to do with what she finds.  So far, she has been
>>>> attempting to garbage-pick for anything detrimental to Judyth while
>>>> ignoring valuable corroborating information for Judyth's statements.
In
>>>> case you are just blissfully naive, that is what dirt-digging looks
like.
>>>>> No one has attempted to try and find out anything scandulous about
>>>>> Judyth to do with her own personal life....that is not of any
im****tance
>>>>> to us.
>>>> Really?  Then apparently it doesn't bother you that Barb seems to be
>>>> furious that she is unable to get personal details on Judyth's
situation
>>>> at RP and at St. Francis U, from people who are protecting someone
who was
>>>> a minor at the time?
>>>>> No one has attempted to go beyond what she herself has claimed.
>>>> Not so.  Barb has been tugging like a dog with a chew toy on every
moment
>>>> at RP, and wants to know all the intimate details of why Judyth left
St.
>>>> Francis.  Judyth's statement have not been enough to satisfy Barb.
>>>> #Pam, why the hell should they be ? If someone tells you their mother
was
>>>> venusian, you take that at face value?
>>> Are you comfortable with Barb's trying to get information about
someone
>>> who was a minor at the time? Doesn't any of the snooping for dirt at
RP
>>> and St. Francis, even when told these things are confidential, make
you
>>> even a tiny bit queasy?
>> She was 18. And what's wrong with trying to verify what Judyth claims?
> 
> That could have been done without snooping.

And how does talking to witnesses to Judyth or people with access to 
records pertaining to Judyth constitute snooping?

>> And are you including Tony in your denunciation here? After all, Judyth
>> was 17 when she wrote that letter to Kennedy and it was Tony who went
>> digging for dirt that time. (Although, admittedly, Tony wouldn't have
>> thought to do it if I hadn't suggested it.)
> 
> Retrieving a letter doesn't involve snooping.

I'm sure the CIA will be happy to read that.

> 
>