John McAdams wrote:
> On 5 May 2008 22:38:05 -0400, "tomnln" <tomnln@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> Is this your Denial that the page is from the ARRB John?
>>
>> You supposedly teach the subject on a University level for GOD's sake.
>>
>> You should recognize it before anyone else.
>>
>> Whaty "Consessions" will you make if I PINPOINT the origin of the page
>> posted?
>>
>> If I'm gonna do the Research for a University professor there HAS to be
a
>> RFeward.
>>
>>
>
> Sashay(tm)!!!
>
> It's obvious to everybody why you won't explain the origin of this.
>
> It's some source that has no credibility, but you want people to
> accept it at face value.
>
You can't make that claim. It is a typical WC defender tactic to attack
the credibility of the source. For all you know it could be Helms's
testimony.
> You are concealing information.
>
He's just plain sloppy.
> That's not how honest research is done.
>
As I told him, he has an obligation to identify where it came from.
And his response which YOU allowed was him saying that he would shove it
up my ass.
> You are playing silly games, and everybody here knows it.
>
His main game is gotcha. He thinks he can post some irrelevant do***ent
and debunk someone's point.
>
>> "John McAdams" <john.mcadams@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:ec8t14dsrq9f7jki8mfhlm8bor81a31li7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On 5 May 2008 01:56:07 -0400, "tomnln" <tomnln@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "John McAdams" <john.mcadams@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>> news:5q0t14htk46qh0958jl72s7t3fq21d0fqa@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> On 4 May 2008 20:34:39 -0400, "tomnln" <tomnln@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "garyb" <garyn2000@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>
news:da4fc759-c9ec-4564-8e45-d971419d1d4c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> On May 3, 8:28 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>> ANY COMMENTS
>>>>>>> Top Item
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/catch_of_the_day.htm
>>>>>> Interesting. Can you identify that first do***ent further?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> >From Either the ARRB or, the Warrten Commission's Do***ents.
(550,000)
>>>>>> I believe it's from the ARRB.
>>>>> But who and what from the ARRB?
>>>>>
>>>>> Put it in context. Who is asserting these things? Some crackpot?
>>>>>
>>>>> .John
>>>>> --------------
>>>>> http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> When McAdams gets caught short on official records he pleads
"Ignorance".
>>>>
>>>> Is this your admission that you're NOT familiar with the ARRB Re****t
John?
>>>>
>>> Sashay(tm)!!
>>>
>>> It's not from the ARRB Re****t. It may be from an ARRB do***ent. If
>>> so, you need to explain what do***ent.
>>>
>>> We know what evasion means.
>>>
>>> It means you are trying to conceal the true source of the do***ent.
>>>
>>> .John
>>> --------------
>>> http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
> .John
> --------------
> http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
|
