<timstter@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:c2ccd715-1c14-4e73-a856-2c2afdc75890@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
POST
Hi tomnln,
I write:
But tomnln, you ALREADY said that you think it is from ARRB or a
Warren Commission do***ent.
You apparently think that there are in excess of 500,000 WC do***ents,
LOL? I think you mean pages, tomnln.
*****************
(I have those 550,00 pages Timmy (on 5 CD's)
Looks like a HSCA do***ent to me. The woman mentioned, Hess, was with
the HSCA. The statement about Bringuier organising the filming is
garbage, BTW.
*********************
Your opinion didn't have much credibility on the Oswald in Mexico City
Timmy.
Someone has got their wires crossed with Bringuier suggesting the WDSU
radio debate a few days later to Stuckey.
Oswald HIMSELF boasted to Stuckey on WDSU radio about how much media
attention his FPCC demonstration at ITM had got, tomnln. No need to
invlove Bringuier, Oswald was the guy who wanted the publicity.
***************************
The official record Involves bringuier Timmy.
Why do you accept such obviously wrong assertions, as in this
do***ent, as fact, tomnln? Even a cursory listen to Oswald and Stuckey
conversing on *Latin Listening Post* would show you it was wrong.
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
Thanks Timmy;
The page specifically states that Bringueir arranged for the Media
coverage.
You may wanna aprise McAdams.
On May 6, 12:55 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Anthony Marsh" <anthony_ma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:E9GdnVID4P03l4LVnZ2dnUVZ_s_inZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> > tomnln wrote:
>
> >> "John McAdams" <john.mcad...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >>news:5q0t14htk46qh0958jl72s7t3fq21d0fqa@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> On 4 May 2008 20:34:39 -0400, "tomnln" <tom...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >>>> "garyb" <garyn2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>>>>news:da4fc759-c9ec-4564-8e45-d971419d1d4c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> On May 3, 8:28 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>>> ANY COMMENTS
> >>>>> Top Item
>
> >>>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/catch_of_the_day.htm
>
> >>>> Interesting. Can you identify that first do***ent further?
>
> >>>> From Either the ARRB or, the Warrten Commission's Do***ents.
> >>>> (550,000)
>
> >>>> I believe it's from the ARRB.
>
> >>> But who and what from the ARRB?
>
> >>> Put it in context. Who is asserting these things? Some crackpot?
>
> >>> .John
> >>> --------------
> >>>http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
>
> >> When McAdams gets caught short on official records he pleads
> >> "Ignorance".
>
> >> Is this your admission that you're NOT familiar with the ARRB Re****t
> >> John?
>
> >> Not surprising for someone who condones destruction of evidence only
2
> >> or
> >> 3 times. Not surprising for someone who sends computer viruses to his
> >> adversaries.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Marsh wrote;
>
> > If you are going to offer a do***ent you have to properly identify it.
>
> I write;
>
> Another Warren Commission "Apologist" who doesn't recognize the ARRB ! !
!
>
> Why don't you DENY it's from the ARRB?
>
> THEN, I'll shove it up your ASS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
