Re: Oswald's Carcano & The Paper Bag

tomnln wrote:
> 
> "yeuhd" <walloon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>
news:669d4270-46f7-4cb5-95e4-03c1e4ed5484@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On May 6, 3:41 pm, Anthony Marsh <anthony_ma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> yeuhd wrote:
>> > On May 4, 7:37 pm, Anthony Marsh <anthony_ma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> Again, why did Frazier not see the paper bag and comment on it the 
>> way >> he
>> >> asked about the package Oswald put on the back seat? Well? Can't 
>> hear >> you.
>>
>> > In our home, folded empty paper bags just aren't conversation
>> > starters. Never have been, probably never will be. And we're talking
>> > about two guys who were so seldom spoke when commuting (or at work)
>> > that Wes Frazier didn't know Oswald's last name until after the
>> > assassination.
>>
>> The question is not about how close they were as buddies. Frazier
>> said that they did talk about WHY Oswald wanted the ride out on
Thursday
>> instead of Friday, and Frazier did notice the package in the back seat 
>> and
>> ask Lee what it was. So, how could Frazier have not noticed Oswald take
>> with him a paper bag folded up. Not like a grocery bag.
> 
> And my reply again is that a folded up, empty paper bag (vs. a paper bag
> containing an arm-length object) is not a likely conversation starter.
> 

And my reply again is that someone taking his lunch to work in a paper bag

is not a conversation starter. So why did Frazier ask Oswald about the 
paper bag in the back seat. And various posters are claiming that Frazier 
and Oswald never talked. Yet Frazier goes into depth about how they were 
discussing why Oswald wanted the ride out to Irving on Thursday afternoon.

>> OK, show me. So your theory is that Oswald had a secret compartment 
>> inside
>> his jacket?
> 
> No "secret compartment". Once folded in three, and then folded in half, 
> the paper bag could easily sit stuffed into the waist of his pants. Or 
> even sitting freely inside his jacket, given that most zip- up jackets 
> are gathered at the waist. I've often carried papers that way when 

You presume a lot of things without any evidence to sup****t them.

> caught in the rain, with just my hand in the jacket pocket pressing 
> against them to get them from slipping out. No big effort. You've 
> probably done the same.
> 
> 
> Even the WCR did NOT "Speculate" that far.
> 
> 

The WC did not even address the issue of how Oswald got the paper out to 
Irving. They dare not.

>