"very strange, James, as you seem to be responding to some other post -
I never even mentioned Bugliosi - interesting comment on the LNer
"attention" to details - thanks for helping to prove my point -"
-Allen Lowe
You knew I was responding to your post, and I didn't help prove your
point.
After reading your "critique" of one of John McAdam's students, I was
simply stating that reading Bugliosi's book will give you another
perspective instead of automatically assuming Scott's "Deep Politics.." is
the only one. And, I was making the point that conspiracists tend to put
down Bugliosi's book only because of its LN conclusions, and don't
appreciate or acknowledge its vast, in-depth assassination resources.
Now, if you've read "Reclaiming History" and have compared the two, then I
apologize. But something tells me you probably haven't.
And, I guess if you want to believe in your own mind that Peter Dale Scott
has the explanation and answers to the Kennedy assassination, that's your
prerogative.
James
<alowe5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:8b88eb0c-d91f-4344-a9b1-a890f82ea9e7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> very strange, James, as you seem to be responding to some other post -
> I never even mentioned Bugliosi - interesting comment on the LNer
> "attention" to details - thanks for helping to prove my point -
> -Allen Lowe
>
>
|
