On May 2, 8:31=A0pm, Herbert Blenner <a1ea...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Apr 30, 11:05=A0pm, Herbert Blenner <a1ea...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 27, 9:26=A0pm, cdddraftsman <cdddrafts...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 27, 9:09 am, Herbert Blenner <a1ea...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > On Apr 26, 10:31 pm, cdddraftsman <cdddrafts...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > >http://mysite.verizon.net/a1eah71/punchingholes.htm
> > > > > Figures 1, 2, 5, 6, 11
>
> > > > > AKA : Blenners Big Boo Boo !
>
> > > > > It's a shame .
>
> > > > > Those festidiously boring computations , all negated by using
> > > > > drawings :
>
> > > > > Not To Scale ..... Anatomically Imprecise ...... Disregarding
JFK'=
s
> > > > > Unique Anatomy .....
>
> > > > > To Build A =A0Medically and Ballistically Imprecise Picture ....
>
> > > > > Using a Unique Anatomy of the President not present ......
>
> > > > On these points, Lowry, you are showing failure to understand that
I=
> > > > used CE385, CE 386 and CE 388 to demonstrate proper methods of
> > > > forensic analysis.
> > > > In particular, I used figure 1 to illustrate calculation of the
> > > > incidence angle of the bullet from the dimensions of the
elliptical
> > > > hole
>
> > > How precise were they to begin with ? What if they are wrong ?
Please
> > > direct us mere mortals to the section were you talk about possible
> > > errors in your work , I'd like to review that again .
>
> > Frankly, Tom, you would not recognize an error analysis unless it
> > jumped up and waived a flag. I quote from Punching Holes.
>
> Oops, I forgot to copy the quotation.
>
> "The re****ted dimensions of the bullet hole are rounded to one
significant=
> figure. So the actual length of the major axis should be taken as 7
=B10.5=
> mm. Likewise the real length of the minor axis is 4 =B10.5 mm. These
> uncertain dimensions produce a span for the magnitude of incidence
angle.
> Calculations yield 41 =B15 degree."
>
> Herbert
Wheww ....... Herbert ! That made all the difference in the world :-)
Thanks (-: tl
PS : I'll be able to sleep tonight knowing the " incidence angle.
Calculations yielded 41 =B15 degree." .
I hope you haven't burdened me with a debt I can't ever repay ?
|
