Re: JUDYTH: National Science Foundation scholar****p and grants

On May 7, 4:53=C2=A0pm, Anthony Marsh <anthony_ma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Dave Reitzes wrote:
> > On May 6, 5:27=EF=BF=BDpm, Barb Junkkarinen
<barbREMOVE...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> =
wrote:
> >> On 6 May 2008 16:41:01 -0400, Anthony Marsh
>
> >> <anthony_ma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>> William Yates wrote:
> >>>> jfk2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> >>>>> On May 4, 10:44 pm, "paul seaton"
<paulNOseatonS...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> <jfk2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>>>>>>news:488b7357-9f6f-410a-ab75-7dd96e97c757@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>> On May 2, 6:25 pm, gateway...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Dixie M Dea) wrote:
> >>>>>>> Anthony said.....
> >>>>>>> Barb's only goal is to dig up dirt.
> >>>>>>> It's a pity that no one bothered to do any serious fact checking
b=
efore
> >>>>>>> her book was published. It's a pity that 99.99% of the bandwidth
> >>>>>>> here is
> >>>>>>> wasted on attacking Judyth.
> >>>>>>> __________________________________
> >>>>>>> Barb's only goal is in one thing and that is in learning, the
> >>>>>>> truth.....just as most of us want to know. There is no dirt
diggin=
g
> >>>>>>> going
> >>>>>>> on.
> >>>>>> If only that were so. =EF=BF=BDBarb is making a good research
effor=
t, but she
> >>>>>> doesn't know what to do with what she finds. =EF=BF=BDSo far, she
h=
as been
> >>>>>> attempting to garbage-pick for anything detrimental to Judyth
while=

> >>>>>> ignoring valuable corroborating information for Judyth's
statements=
.. In
> >>>>>> case you are just blissfully naive, that is what dirt-digging
looks=

> >>>>>> like.
> >>>>>>> No one has attempted to try and find out anything scandulous
about=

> >>>>>>> Judyth to do with her own personal life....that is not of any
> >>>>>>> im****tance
> >>>>>>> to us.
> >>>>>> Really? =EF=BF=BDThen apparently it doesn't bother you that Barb
se=
ems to be
> >>>>>> furious that she is unable to get personal details on Judyth's
situ=
ation
> >>>>>> at RP and at St. Francis U, from people who are protecting
someone
> >>>>>> who was
> >>>>>> a minor at the time?
> >>>>>>> No one has attempted to go beyond what she herself has claimed.
> >>>>>> Not so. =EF=BF=BDBarb has been tugging like a dog with a chew toy
o=
n every
> >>>>>> moment
> >>>>>> at RP, and wants to know all the intimate details of why Judyth
lef=
t St.
> >>>>>> Francis. =EF=BF=BDJudyth's statement have not been enough to
satisf=
y Barb.
> >>>>>> #Pam, why the hell should they be ? If someone tells you their
moth=
er
> >>>>>> was
> >>>>>> venusian, you take that at face value?
> >>>>> Are you comfortable with Barb's trying to get information about
> >>>>> someone who was a minor at the time? Doesn't any of the snooping
for=

> >>>>> dirt at RP and St. Francis, even when told these things are
> >>>>> confidential, make you even a tiny bit queasy?
> >>>> She was 18. And what's wrong with trying to verify what Judyth
claims=
?
> >>>> And are you including Tony in your denunciation here? After all,
Judy=
th
> >>>> was 17 when she wrote that letter to Kennedy and it was Tony who
went=

> >>>> digging for dirt that time. (Although, admittedly, Tony wouldn't
have=

> >>>> thought to do it if I hadn't suggested it.)
> >>> OH, so now it was YOU who suggested that I find her letter? I
thought
> >>> Barb claimed that. And what dirt did you suggest that I find in her
> >>> letter? It was actually pretty clean after 47 years.
> >> What a total waste of time your posts are. Things get covered over
and
> >> over and over because you go back to misrepresenting them over and
> >> over and over.
>
> > Just ignore him.
>
> > If he makes any research finds to rival his much-touted, seemingly
India=
na
> > Jones-like retrieval of Judyth's letter to the President, chances are
> > we'll hear about it.
>
> No, you won't. Because you refuse to look at the files on my Web page.
> I was the guy who found the photo that Gus Russo did not find




  Why do you feel the need to dig up dirt on Gus Russo?