jfk297x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On May 11, 11:31 pm, William Yates <william_yates...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>> jfk2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>> On May 10, 11:52 pm, William Yates <william_yates...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> wrote:
>>>> jfk2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>>> On May 10, 1:15 pm, Steve Thomas <misledrks...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>> Did Roswell Park ever retract the information sent out saying
Judyth
>>>>>> had been dismissed from the summer program? Id like to see some
>>>>>> evidence if they did.
>>>>> Martin was given information some time before that was consistent
with
>>>>> Judyth completing the program. That information is consistent with
the
>>>>> level of information one would expect from an institution such as
RP.
>>>>> None of that has been retracted.
>>>>> Looks like Barb has been left to hang...again.
>>>> And that information is also consistent with her being dismissed from
RP.
>>> Untrue. A grant would not have been given to someone who had been
>>> 'dismissed'.
>> It didn't say she got a grant for fini****ng; it said she was paid from
a
>> grant.
>>
>
> Grants were awarded at the end of the program.
You can do***ent this, of course?
The e-mail Martin posted didn't say anything, one way or the other,
about her fini****ng the program.
>In addition, the paper
> Judyth wrote at RP was presented three times.
>
Or so Judyth says. But it was only two presentations before Barb found
the IAS info.
But you can, I presume, do***ent the other two appearances? With
something other than what Judyth says?
|
