Re: Missing the first shot

Andrew Mason wrote:
> Jas wrote:
> 
>> Andrew wrote: "The first shot did not miss, according to the evidence. 
>> So there is no reason to speculate on how Oswald could have missed."
>>
>> Disinformation, plain and simple.
> 
> Now you can argue that 16 witnesses got it all wrong the same way. But 
> you can't accuse me, fairly, of spreading disinformation. It is real 
> information - 16 witnesses described in great detail how JFK reacted to 
> the first shot. I am just pointing it out.
> 
> Andrew Mason

Yes, we can. Because you are stating something as a fact, claiming it is 
evidence. When all you are doing is cherry picking your witnesses.