Re: Missing the first shot

On May 12, 3:11=A0pm, Andrew Mason <a.ma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Jas wrote:
> > Andrew wrote: "The first shot did not miss, according to the evidence.
> > So there is no reason to speculate on how Oswald could have missed."
>
> > Disinformation, plain and simple.
>
> Now you can argue that 16 witnesses got it all wrong the same way. But
> you can't accuse me, fairly, of spreading disinformation. It is real
> information - 16 witnesses described in great detail how JFK reacted to
> the first shot. I am just pointing it out.
>
> Andrew Mason

Andrew,

You will notice several witnesses describe a firecracker sound, then two 
shots. They refer to the "first shot" that wounded the President, meaning 
the actual 2nd shot. In other words, they don't tell us the President was 
wounded by the firecracker. Six credible witnesses saw the first shot 
bounce off the street. Two other witnesses saw debris or fragments flying 
out of the limousine on the first shot. Obviously the first shot, the 
"firecracker", missed all passengers and smashed into the pavement 
disintegrating into fragments that sprayed the Limousine and caused 
superficial wounds to the President. Agent Kellerman claims he heard the 
President exclaim "My God I'm hit!". Pathologists advise the President 
would be unable to speak after the throat wound, so if JFK did verbalize 
to being injured, it must be from shrapnel produced by the ricochet of the

first shot.