Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy

On May 14, 7:30=A0am, "Conrad W. Paul" <cwp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> It astounds me that everyone says Oswald was paid by the CIA, yet offer
no=

> hard proof/evidence from the CIA, FBI,GOA for a specific transactional
> moment linked to the assasination aside from blatant subjective
suppositio=
n
> and inuendo.
>

As a CTer, I looked for years for evidence of Lee secretly being paid by 
an outside source, be it a gov't agency or even the mafia.  I couldn't 
find any evidence he received a single penny.  I shared this conclusion 
with a major CTer on this forum in private (he may not want me to name 
him) and he admitted that he too had no evidence of payments to Lee.  We 
both concluded Lee was a willing participant to a conspiracy (I have Lee 
in the SN.  He does not.).  Yet we also had to conclude he was an unpaid 
volunteer.

This actually fits in better with LN thinking than CT as it requires the 
type of personality LNers attribute to Oswald.  I further examined Lee to 
determine if he was being blackmailed into his participating as the 
op****tunity existed for Lee to be recalled to Active Duty and then tried 
by the USMC for his defection (Threatening to provide the Soviets with 
military information would have been sufficient grounds alone for Lee to 
get ten years at hard labor.).  Yet careful study of his actions were more

consistent with them being voluntary versus involuntary. I eventually 
concluded Lee leaned towards a suicidal mindset (My learned colleague 
above disagrees.) willing to pull a trigger if he felt the political cause

justified his personal sacrifice.  Thus, money was not an object.

And while US intelligence have their fingerprints all over Oswald, he was 
not acting under their authority on 11/22/63 in regards to JFK being 
assassinated.  The presence of those "fingerprints" keep complicating 
things for CTer's who want to make this connection while the thought that 
Lee can be a single shooter in a conspiracy appears to be an impossible 
thought for LNer's to comprehend.

Good luck.

::Clark::