Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Assassination JFK > Re: Oswald part...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 13 of 30 Topic 10380 of 11035
Post > Topic >>

Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy

by 74030.3022@[EMAIL PROTECTED] May 15, 2008 at 04:19 PM

On May 14, 10:29 am, "tomnln" <tom...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Name a witness who discredited Wilcott's testimony Dolan?
>
> Wilcott gave the committee 15 names of who he discussed Oswald with.
>
> Name one of them?

Possily, if you admit you are incapable of doing the research in the HSCA 
re****t.  Otherwise, I am not going to break the law inre naming CIA 
officers.

>
> CIA Director Richard Helms was charged/convicted of Perjury.

Absolutely UNTRUE A total falsehood.  Helms was NEVER charge with oerjury,

a felony, and NEVER convicted of perjury.  You have no evidence to claim 
that.

>
> ps;
>
> Oswald was tested in the Russian language at the Military school of
> languages 7 months before he went to Russia.
>
> Are you telling us that the CIA "Always" obeys the law?

No. But yes to American law, most especially inre paying salaries even 
when under cover as I knew of a couple of Marines..CIA was regularly 
audited.

>
> SEE>>>  http://whokilledjfk.net/spy.htm

That site is JUNK, full of CRAP. I would if I could UNCONDITIONALLY post 
rebuttals.  But you are too afraid to opem it up as you know it is full of

BS

>
> <74030.3...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:7c89ae96-142f-4775-9538-595efc213ff5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > On May 9, 11:31 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> "firefly" <firefly...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> >>news:vx0Vj.2885$17.89@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> >I used to think he was innocently working for the CIA, but judging
by
> >> >the
> >> >testimony of his arrest in the theater, if it is accurate, he was
guilty
> >> >with the bad guys, even if he didn't do the actual killing.
>
> >> > ---firefly
>
> >> Oswald was paid by the CIA.
>
> > Oswald was NEVER paid by CIA.  All Wilcott's claims were contradicted
by
> > other witnesses. None of Wo;cott's testimony was sup****ted by any
other
> > witness or do***ents. Some of his falsehood's were obvious, e.g., that
> > Oswald was taught Russin and intel by the Marines at Atsugi. Never
> > happened. A big falsehood is that CIA could not pay him as as Oswald
was
> > on active duty. He could not be cleared. Back to paying, after getting
> > approval from CIA HQ to hire him, HQ would reject paying him as it is
> > against the law. Active duty military personnel who work for CIA are
> > considered on tem****ary assignment and paid by their organization, in
> > Oswald's (if he was working for CIA which he wasn't, the Marine Corps.
> > Thw HSCA did not believe Wilcott.
>
> >   As for trying for perjury, it would have been a waste of time,
> > personnel, and resources, without accompli****ng anything. I realize
that
> > is beyond your knowledge of government.
>
> >    s/f  Dolan
 




 30 Posts in Topic:
Oswald part of the conspiracy
"firefly" <f  2008-05-09 21:56:23 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
"tomnln" <to  2008-05-09 23:31:17 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
74030.3022@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-13 23:35:41 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
"tomnln" <to  2008-05-14 10:28:48 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
74030.3022@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-13 23:37:03 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
"tomnln" <to  2008-05-14 10:29:23 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
Anthony Marsh <anthony  2008-05-14 22:42:40 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
"Conrad W. Paul"  2008-05-14 10:30:27 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
Peter Fokes<jpfCT@[EMA  2008-05-14 10:33:48 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
"tomnln" <to  2008-05-14 22:43:50 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
Anthony Marsh <anthony  2008-05-15 10:32:37 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
clarkwilkins@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-14 22:55:11 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
74030.3022@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-15 16:19:58 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
"tomnln" <to  2008-05-15 20:22:41 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
74030.3022@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-15 16:20:27 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
curtjester1 <curtjeste  2008-05-15 16:21:59 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
curtjester1 <curtjeste  2008-05-15 23:05:07 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
74030.3022@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-16 23:02:49 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
"tomnln" <to  2008-05-17 13:45:44 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
Anthony Marsh <anthony  2008-05-17 23:14:49 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
"tomnln" <to  2008-05-18 01:01:31 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
curtjester1 <curtjeste  2008-05-17 13:49:40 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
74030.3022@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-17 23:21:50 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
Anthony Marsh <anthony  2008-05-22 00:36:40 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
clarkwilkins@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-22 03:57:10 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
Russ Burr <rdcgbu@[EMA  2008-05-22 16:58:41 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
clarkwilkins@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-22 03:57:29 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
curtjester1 <curtjeste  2008-05-10 14:14:22 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
Anthony Marsh <anthony  2008-05-11 21:38:59 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
Anthony Marsh <anthony  2008-05-10 18:31:45 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Aug 29 17:31:16 CDT 2008.