Re: Bullets, Magic & other

thaliacole asked: "How do Lone Theorists reconcile that one of the bullets 
allegedly used by Oswald smashed through two men, their clothes and broke 
bones and came out the other end virtually unscathed, with no bodily 
fluids on it (and with its grooves intact - a miracle event against all 
odds) and the other bullet allegedly used by Oswald on Kennedy 
disintegrated on impact? How could two bullets supposedly the same react 
in such a different fa****on from each other?"

Ok, I'll play along on this one, even though it's been asked and explained

within the context of the Kennedy assassination at least 5,000 times since

1963.

Quite simply, the odds dictate -- and are astronomical -- that no 2 
bullets will end up the same way, even when hitting the same kind of 
target and with the exact same weapon and ammunition and range. You must 
know that by now...

In the Kennedy shooting there were two different types of targets, one 
involved two human bodies, and the other, one human head. These different 
types of targets, although both human bodies, obviously contributed to the

differences.

If you're looking for numbers, you can probably ask Herbert Blenner, or 
other mathematicians here what the odds are that two bullets will come out

exactly the same.

Actually, I'd like to see that too...

James

<thaliacole@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:d643af6d-7d5a-4731-a64d-f0e656787021@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> How do Lone Theorists reconcile that one of the bullets allegedly used
> by Oswald smashed through two men, their clothes and broke bones and
> came out the other end virtually unscathed, with no bodily fluids on
> it (and with its grooves intact - a miracle event against all odds)
> and the other bullet allegedly used by Oswald on Kennedy disintegrated
> on impact? How could two bullets supposedly the same react in such a
> different fa****on from each other?
>