Re: Bullets, Magic & other

David Von Pein wrote:
>>>> "How do Lone [Assassin] Theorists reconcile that one of the bullets 
> allegedly used by Oswald smashed through two men, their clothes and
broke 
> bones and came out the other end virtually unscathed, with no bodily 
> fluids on it (and with its grooves intact - a miracle event against all 
> odds) and the other bullet allegedly used by Oswald on Kennedy 
> disintegrated on impact? How could two bullets supposedly the same react

> in such a different fa****on from each other?" <<<
> 
> 
> It's been proven that MC/WCC ammunition WILL react in just exactly the 
> same general ways that Lee Harvey Oswald's two bullets did on November
22, 
> 1963. Bullet tests were done by Dr. Olivier for the Warren Commission,
and 
> even better tests were done by John Lattimer using Oswald's ammunition:
> 
> http://i1.tinypic.com/44t3b0n.jpg
> 
> And then there's the "test" bullet from the 2004 program "JFK: Beyond
The 
> Magic Bullet", which generally looks the same as CE399 -- i.e., it ended

> up COMPLETELY INTACT (NOT FRAGMENTED at all) after striking pretty much 
> the same parts of two "bodies", with the nose still rounded, just like 
> 399:
> 


Not exactly, but close enough for a WC defender.
Henry Hurt also produced an intact bullet by firing it into a water tank.
Law enforcement does that every day to create test bullets.

> http://216.122.129.112/dc/user_files/6735.jpg
> 
> 
> www.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/69758897e673c5a2
> 
> 
> PARTIAL REPLAY:
> 
>>>> "How do Lone [Assassin] Theorists reconcile that one of the bullets 
> allegedly used by Oswald smashed through two men, their clothes and
broke 
> bones and came out the other end virtually unscathed, with no bodily 
> fluids on it (and with its grooves intact - a miracle event against all 
> odds)..." <<<
> 
> 
> Here's another look at the Discovery Channel's SBT test bullet (two
views 
> actually). This "Beyond The Magic Bullet" MC/WCC test missile smashed 
> through two bodies and broke THREE bones (2 ribs and 1 wrist bone).
> 
> Voila!
> 
> THE GROOVES ARE COMPLETELY INTACT! Another myth handily debunked:
> 
> 
> 
> http://216.122.129.112/dc/user_files/6735.jpg
> 
> http://216.122.129.112/dc/user_files/6722.jpg
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ANOTHER PARTIAL REPLAY:
> 
> 
>>>> "How do Lone [Assassin] Theorists reconcile that one of the bullets 
> allegedly used by Oswald smashed through two men, their clothes and
broke 
> bones and came out the other end virtually unscathed, with no bodily 
> fluids on it..." <<<
> 
> 
>       "One can only wonder why Commission Exhibit No. 399 did not have
any 
> blood residuum on it. My only guess is that the blood traces that must 
> have been on it were removed by someone early on...almost as a matter of

> course. In all the evidence bullets I handled in court in murder cases 
> during my prosecutorial career, none had any visible blood on them. ....
> 
>       "Interestingly, [Robert] Frazier [of the FBI] testified that with 
> respect to the two main bullet fragments found in the presidential 
> limousine [CE567 and CE569], "there was a very slight residue of blood
or 
> some other material adhering, but it did not interfere with the 
> examination. It was wiped off to clean up the bullet for examination"."
-- 
> Vincent T. Bugliosi; Page 425 of Endnotes in "Reclaiming History"
(c.2007)
> 
> 
> www.amazon.com/RECLAIMING-HISTORY/review/RZD82270D69E8
>