Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Assassination JFK > Re: Oswald part...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 19 of 30 Topic 10380 of 11238
Post > Topic >>

Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy

by "tomnln" <tomnln@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 17, 2008 at 01:45 PM

<74030.3022@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:b8c5aded-c667-4f20-b805-a591a783efa7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On May 14, 10:28 am, "tomnln" <tom...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> <74030.3...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>>
news:7dde2067-1253-4874-9235-3feb5c3252cf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> > tomnln wrote:
>> >> "firefly" <firefly...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >>news:vx0Vj.2885$17.89@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >I used to think he was innocently working for the CIA, but judging
by
>> >> >the
>> >> >testimony of his arrest in the theater, if it is accurate, he was 
>> >> >guilty
>> >> >with the bad guys, even if he didn't do the actual killing.
>>
>> >> > ---firefly
>>
>> >> Oswald was paid by the CIA.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 74030 WROTE;
>>
>> > Oswald was NEVER paid by CIA. Wilcott's testimony was totally false. 
>> > Every
>> > claim he made was contradicted by other witnesses including one he 
>> > named
>> > as talking with in Japan when that person was nolongerin Japan.  NO
>> > witness corroborated ANY of his testimony. Nor di he produce any 
>> > do***ents
>> > to sup****t his testimony.
>>
>>      I write;
>>
>> Wilcott was NEVER charged with Perjury;



> So What?  What would it accomplish?

TRUTH/JUSTICE

>> Why don't you Name thaqt witness who Disputed him?



> The law prohibits it.

What Law?   their names were Already given in Wilcott's testimony.


>> Wilcott Names 15 other people who discussed the subject with him.



> He does? then why should Ibane them if you know that?

NONE of those Wilcott mentioned were called.



>> The Committee never called ANY of them.
>
> Are you sure?  How?


NONE of them are in the official records as having been questioned by the 
HSCA.





>> YOU have to prove Perjury  . . .
>
> If ther was an indictment and trial.
> AND, Produce testimony of those who proved him
>> wrong.
>
> Since the HSCA did not request Wilcott be charged.  They did not believe
> him based on witnesses they heard.  If there was a trial, witnesses
would
> have been produced, but there was no trial.  There was no reason for
one,
> The HSCA members believed he lied.


Name the witnesses against Wilcott???


>>           (This is America)
>>
>>  SEE>>>  http://whokilledjfk.net/spy.htm
>>
>>  Oswald was also a Paif FBI In formant.
>>
>>  SEE>>>  http://whokilledjfk.net/spy.htm
>>                       (Bottom of page)
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
 




 30 Posts in Topic:
Oswald part of the conspiracy
"firefly" <f  2008-05-09 21:56:23 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
"tomnln" <to  2008-05-09 23:31:17 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
74030.3022@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-13 23:35:41 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
"tomnln" <to  2008-05-14 10:28:48 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
74030.3022@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-13 23:37:03 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
"tomnln" <to  2008-05-14 10:29:23 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
Anthony Marsh <anthony  2008-05-14 22:42:40 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
"Conrad W. Paul"  2008-05-14 10:30:27 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
Peter Fokes<jpfCT@[EMA  2008-05-14 10:33:48 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
"tomnln" <to  2008-05-14 22:43:50 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
Anthony Marsh <anthony  2008-05-15 10:32:37 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
clarkwilkins@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-14 22:55:11 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
74030.3022@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-15 16:19:58 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
"tomnln" <to  2008-05-15 20:22:41 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
74030.3022@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-15 16:20:27 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
curtjester1 <curtjeste  2008-05-15 16:21:59 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
curtjester1 <curtjeste  2008-05-15 23:05:07 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
74030.3022@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-16 23:02:49 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
"tomnln" <to  2008-05-17 13:45:44 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
Anthony Marsh <anthony  2008-05-17 23:14:49 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
"tomnln" <to  2008-05-18 01:01:31 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
curtjester1 <curtjeste  2008-05-17 13:49:40 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
74030.3022@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-17 23:21:50 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
Anthony Marsh <anthony  2008-05-22 00:36:40 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
clarkwilkins@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-22 03:57:10 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
Russ Burr <rdcgbu@[EMA  2008-05-22 16:58:41 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
clarkwilkins@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-22 03:57:29 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
curtjester1 <curtjeste  2008-05-10 14:14:22 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
Anthony Marsh <anthony  2008-05-11 21:38:59 
Re: Oswald part of the conspiracy
Anthony Marsh <anthony  2008-05-10 18:31:45 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Oct 12 0:14:37 CDT 2008.