On May 17, 11:59 pm, "Michael O'Dell" <ml...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> <jfk2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:0505c36a-b674-4dee-b80d-a8bdffa89372@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> > On May 16, 8:40 pm, "Michael O'Dell" <ml...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> "Martin Shackelford" <msha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> >>news:1HcXj.982$qH4.901@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> > Commenting on the claim that Judyth was dismissed, Roswell Park
stated
> >> > that wasn't their "official position," and that whoever Barb talked
> >> > with
> >> > had apparently misremembered.
> >> > This was posted before.
>
> >> > Martin
>
> >> As I recall, they said someone may have been wrong. Not that someone
was
> >> wrong, or was apparently wrong. There's a difference and you are
> >> twisting
> >> it the way you want it to go.
>
> >> That's just the kind of thing Tony says he likes to attack, but for
some
> >> reason he's let this slide. Wonder why.
>
> >> It was a non-denial and a non-confirmation. Someone was trying to
stay
> >> out of it once it turned into an argument.
>
> >> Michael
>
> > Barb ran with incorrect information and she has been left swinging in
> > the wind.
>
> Barb re****ted what she had been told.
Were that the case she would have presented the information she had,
including quotes and contact data so that others could verify her
statements and then backed off. Instead, her story becomes wilder with
each retelling. Each new embellishment takes us another step farther from
'the truth'. However, you seem blissfully unaware of that.
I thought that's what you were
> wanting her to do. Even if it turned out to be incorrect, it wouldn't
> leave Barb "swinging", whatever that means. It was still what she was
> told.
>
> However, your claim that it was incorrect is unsup****ted. And Judyth
has
> apparently confirmed it herself.
>
> Michael
|
