It wasn't the same paper.
Martin
"Barb Junkkarinen" <barbREMOVEjfk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:244434hq87fmq452rkkei5kdds4qcv1fqa@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 19 May 2008 00:29:54 -0400, jfk297x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>>On May 16, 9:18 am, "Martin Shackelford" <msha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>wrote:
>>> I've seen no sign whatsoever of that, Barb.
>>>
>>> Martin
>>
>>Of course not. Barb has yet to comprehend the significance of her
>>tracking down Judyth's paper on melanogenisis. That alone corroborates
>>the fact that the paper was not only presented once, but two or three
>>different times, the first being at RP. That being the case, the entire
>>concept of a 'dismissal' is ridiculous.
>
> How do you know the paper presented at RP was the same one presented
> at the Indiana Academy of Science? Where is this paper, have you ever
> seen it?
>>
>>>
>>> "Barb Junkkarinen" <barbREMOVE...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>
>>> news:eq9p24d55iavk9nqqqlmumf88av29kknbm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>> > On 15 May 2008 16:14:20 -0400, "Martin Shackelford"
>>> > <msha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>> >>Judyth did present a list of witnesses to her presentation of her
>>> >>paper at
>>> >>the final session. Not of any interest to you, apparently. Not the
>>> >>kind of
>>> >>witnesses you're looking for.
>>>
>>> >>Martin
>>>
>>> > Oh, to the contrary, Martin, I am very interested in any witnesses
to
>>> > any final session where papers were presented. :-)
>>>
>>> >>"Barb Junkkarinen" <barbREMOVE...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> >>news:cmtb24d35segjm0d90prq4jmhf9gdv0ug0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> >>> On 10 May 2008 14:15:04 -0400, Steve Thomas <misledrks...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >>>> Did Roswell Park ever retract the information sent out saying
>>> >>>> Judyth
>>> >>>>had been dismissed from the summer program? Id like to see some
>>> >>>>evidence if they did.
>>>
>>> >>> Roswell Park has not retracted the information given to me.
>>>
>>> >>> No evidence of them having retracted it to anyone has been posted
>>> >>> and
>>> >>> Judyth posted a statement acknowledging Dr. Mirand told a coup[le
>>> >>> researchers that she had been dismissed ..... for a "housing
>>> >>> violoation."
>>> >>> No researcher has stepped forward, though I have asked several
>>> >>> times,
>>> >>> to confirm that Dr. Mirand told them Judyth was dismissed for a
>>> >>> "housing violation."
>>>
>>> >>> Judyth, of course, went on to explain that she had finished the
>>> >>> program in grand style anyway.
>>>
>>> >>> IFFFFF Dr. Mirand had told ANY of them that Judyth had been
>>> >>> dismissed
>>> >>> from the program for a "housing violation" but that she had
>>> >>> completed
>>> >>> the program anyway, and in grand style .... that info would have
>>> >>> been
>>> >>> posted so fast that the handset on the phone wouldn't have had
time
>>> >>> to
>>> >>> cool.
>>>
>>> >>> I've asked both Pamela and Martin just where the "housing
violation"
>>> >>> thing came from. If it's not what either of them or Martin's
>>> >>> "California researcher" were told by Mirand ... then did that
>>> >>> "housing
>>> >>> violation" story come from ... Judyth?
>>>
>>> >>> So, no ... the RP statement that Judyth did not complete the
program
>>> >>> but was dismissed has NOT been retracted.
>>>
>>> >>> And no ... there has been no evidence posted of anything as
regards
>>> >>> any info any of them got from Dr. Mirand.
>>>
>>> >>> Bests,
>>> >>> Barb :-)
>>
|
