On May 19, 2:31 pm, "Martin Shackelford" <msha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> The melanogenesis paper wasn't the one she presented at the final
session
> at Roswell Park, Pam. Not sure where you got that idea. It was written
at
> St. Francis College, based on work she did there.
The subject was the same -- melanogenesis -- and it is likely that the
thesis was the same. There was not much time between RP and the Oct
presentation of the paper for significant new research, was there? Judyth
didn't start cl***** until mid-September.
>
> Martin
>
> <jfk2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:8e5959b7-265d-47bd-b3ed-378340597a01@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > On May 16, 9:18 am, "Martin Shackelford" <msha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > wrote:
> >> I've seen no sign whatsoever of that, Barb.
>
> >> Martin
>
> > Of course not. Barb has yet to comprehend the significance of her
> > tracking down Judyth's paper on melanogenisis. That alone
corroborates
> > the fact that the paper was not only presented once, but two or three
> > different times, the first being at RP. That being the case, the
entire
> > concept of a 'dismissal' is ridiculous.
>
> >> "Barb Junkkarinen" <barbREMOVE...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> >>news:eq9p24d55iavk9nqqqlmumf88av29kknbm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> > On 15 May 2008 16:14:20 -0400, "Martin Shackelford"
> >> > <msha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> >>Judyth did present a list of witnesses to her presentation of her
paper
> >> >>at
> >> >>the final session. Not of any interest to you, apparently. Not the
kind
> >> >>of
> >> >>witnesses you're looking for.
>
> >> >>Martin
>
> >> > Oh, to the contrary, Martin, I am very interested in any witnesses
to
> >> > any final session where papers were presented. :-)
>
> >> >>"Barb Junkkarinen" <barbREMOVE...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >> >>news:cmtb24d35segjm0d90prq4jmhf9gdv0ug0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >>> On 10 May 2008 14:15:04 -0400, Steve Thomas
<misledrks...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> >>> wrote:
>
> >> >>>> Did Roswell Park ever retract the information sent out saying
> >> >>>> Judyth
> >> >>>>had been dismissed from the summer program? Id like to see some
> >> >>>>evidence if they did.
>
> >> >>> Roswell Park has not retracted the information given to me.
>
> >> >>> No evidence of them having retracted it to anyone has been posted
and
> >> >>> Judyth posted a statement acknowledging Dr. Mirand told a coup[le
> >> >>> researchers that she had been dismissed ..... for a "housing
> >> >>> violoation."
> >> >>> No researcher has stepped forward, though I have asked several
times,
> >> >>> to confirm that Dr. Mirand told them Judyth was dismissed for a
> >> >>> "housing violation."
>
> >> >>> Judyth, of course, went on to explain that she had finished the
> >> >>> program in grand style anyway.
>
> >> >>> IFFFFF Dr. Mirand had told ANY of them that Judyth had been
dismissed
> >> >>> from the program for a "housing violation" but that she had
completed
> >> >>> the program anyway, and in grand style .... that info would have
been
> >> >>> posted so fast that the handset on the phone wouldn't have had
time
> >> >>> to
> >> >>> cool.
>
> >> >>> I've asked both Pamela and Martin just where the "housing
violation"
> >> >>> thing came from. If it's not what either of them or Martin's
> >> >>> "California researcher" were told by Mirand ... then did that
> >> >>> "housing
> >> >>> violation" story come from ... Judyth?
>
> >> >>> So, no ... the RP statement that Judyth did not complete the
program
> >> >>> but was dismissed has NOT been retracted.
>
> >> >>> And no ... there has been no evidence posted of anything as
regards
> >> >>> any info any of them got from Dr. Mirand.
>
> >> >>> Bests,
> >> >>> Barb :-)
|
