Re: Dale Myers debunks his own work.

clarkwilkins@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> On May 15, 7:33 am, David Von Pein <davevonp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 

>>>>>"Nowhere does [Myers] cite any medical sup****t that the bullet passed

through JFK at a downward angle. But the HSCA did. They tracked the wound 
at an 11-degree UPWARD angle. The exact opposite to what Myers showed. 
What a surprise. Again, what does this say about the quality of [Myers'] 
work when UP becomes DOWN?" <<<

>>
>>You're not stating the HSCA's position regarding the "11 degrees
>>upward" nonsense correctly at all.
> 
> 
> I did.  You admit the angle below.
> 
> 
>>Do you think that a gunman shot Kennedy in the upper back from below
>>street level or some such impossible angle (so as to achieve a literal
>>"upward" trajectory through JFK's body when the shooting occurred)?
> 
> 
> Angle of incidence equals angle of deflection.
> 
> It's simple physics.  A downward aimed bullet will deflect upward on
> impact - Not downward.

Perhaps we could apply that principle to JBC's wrist. The bullet was 
moving downward. It struck the radius - the hardest bone in the human 
body, on the top of the back of the wrist. Which way is it going to 
deflect?

Andrew Mason