Re: Bullets, Magic & other

On 31 May, 12:32, yeuhd <NeedlesWax...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 31, 3:03=A0pm, curtjester1 <curtjest...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > They DIDN'T talk about a wallet! Nobody, police or civilian,
mentioned=

> > > a Tippit-scene wallet in a police re****t, interview, affidavit, or
WC
> > > testimony. FBI agent Barrett didn't say anything about a wallet
until
> > > 1995, when fellow agent Hosty was writing his book.- Hide quoted
text =
-
>
> > You said Reiland said it was a wallet and that he filmed it (the scene
> > where it was held up) and that was by the Texaco station. =A0That
would
> > be where all the officer were as can be plainly scene just by the film
> > frame.
>
> ???
>
> I said nothing about a Texaco station.

This is your quote from May 27:

My theory, synthesizing what we know of the wallet: it was the wallet of a

third party unrelated to Oswald, Tippit, or the shooting of Tippit. And it

was not found at the scene of Tippit's murder.

Quote off:

If it was not found there, it had to be found somewhere.  I hope you would

agree to that.  It would be likely to be found where they were filming the

officers with the 'wallet' wouldn't it?  That would be by the Texaco 
Station.

If you deem it a 'neutral' wallet, then why would the name "Oswald", and 
"Hidell" be from that source?  Why are you sup****ting Myers and not 
sup****ting Reiland?

CJ