Re: Z-film, JFK Forward Motion @ 230

On May 10, 10:14=A0am, curtjester1 <curtjest...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On 9 May, 18:55, markina...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>
> > I'm interested in seeing how the group interprets the following video
cl=
ip
> > that I prepared for discussion. The clip shows frames 223 to 240,
> > inclusive, and shows it first in real time, then 50% speed, then 25%
> > speed. Each clip repeats 5 times. JFK's very abrupt forward motion
begin=
s
> > at 230, and concludes at 234. I used the secret service hand- hold
brack=
et
> > to align each frame.
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dg-hrPPy6fgI
>
> > Respectfully submitted,
> > ~Mark
>
> For one thing, we can be sure of, it's not a neuro-muscular spasm or
> reaction. =A0You might want to consider Gil's scenario, in, 'Was JFK
Tryin=
g To
> Cough Up A Bullet'
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dwd1o0UTb3oc
>
> CJ

'Was JFK Trying To Cough Up A Bullet' ..... Hahahhahahahaa !

After Gil no one will be able to accuse the critical community of not
having a healthy sense of black humor . The only sad thing is that he
half way believe's his own non-sense .

BTW who has the more magical bullet(s) in this case ? LNer's that have
proven that bullets can remain undamaged after transiting two body's
or CTer's who have to have a bullet that strikes JFK in the back (*)
and one in the front of his neck to posit confusion needlessly ? Very
odd behaviour .

(*)  And then falls back out the same entrance wound ? That would make
it a WBT (Weak Bullet Theory) .